Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 16 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Pisa_-_Decorazione_porta_di_sinistra_del_duomo.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Pisa - Decorazione porta di sinistra del duomo. By User:DnaX --Ezarate 20:05, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose The lower part is sharp but the upper part is not. Let's move this to CR for a decision. -- Ikan Kekek 07:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Uploaded new version with reduced chroma noise and somewhat less verticalisation. It could also be that this version leaves a slightly more homogeneous sharpness impression. --Smial 12:09, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks. I'm still not really convinced it's sharp enough, though. -- Ikan Kekek 20:06, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 Comment I intentionally refrained from the usual downscaling and sharpening after the perspective correction, so as not to suppress details in another photographer's work that might be important to them. However, in the process of noise reduction, it was very slightly conservatively re-sharpened. Printed in A4 size, I consider the image sharpness to be more than sufficient. --Smial 21:48, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support. Good for me -- Spurzem 15:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:59, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

File:2021-06-27_02_Chesapeake_Bay_deadrise_workboat_used_for_crabbing.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Chesapeake Bay workboat built in the traditional deadrise design and used for crabbing. --GRDN711 19:57, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose The boat is fine, but the seagulls on the posts, which to me are part of the composition, are blurred. --~~~~ --Tagooty 02:41, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Removed a white out-of-focus crab trap buoy and seagull in the far background to minimize these items as visual distractions. I could crop tight to the boat but feel the birds-on-posts, like slightly out-of-focus trees in the background of a land image, help maintain the marine environment of this one. Am sending this to CR for further review. --GRDN711 15:02, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Ich verstehe das Problem mit dem unscharfen Hintergrund nicht. Das Bokeh des Objektivs ist nicht schön, aber das ist reine Geschmacksache, kein Fehler des Fotografen. Ich hätte da auch nichts weggestempelt. Hier ist QIC, nicht FPC. --Smial 12:19, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Obwohl der Bewerber meine Fotos sehr oft zwar nicht als schlecht, aber wegen ihm nicht genehmer Beschreibung bei VI als wertlos abqualifiziert, wäre es unfair, dieses Bild eines Fischerboots abzuwerten. Ich finde es gut. -- Spurzem 15:55, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support OK to me. The birds are part of the composition but in the background, and it's OK for them to be less sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 20:08, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:57, 15 July 2022 (UTC)