Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 01 2023
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Coat of arms on the side of the house Kieler Straße 46, Eckernförde, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany --XRay 04:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture “Kalle & Krischan” at Kattsund 26, Eckernförde, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany --XRay 04:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gatepost at the entrance of the Holmer Beliebung cemetery in Schleswig, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany --XRay 04:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Noorwanderweg to the landscape at Windebyer Noor, Windeby, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany --XRay 04:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Restoration Prinses Margriettunnel During the work, the tunnel sections are temporarily held in place by 10,000 Big Bags filled with sand.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Restoration Prinses Margriettunnel During the work, the tunnel sections are temporarily held in place by 10,000 Big Bags filled with sand.
-
- Nomination Stream valley landscape of the Lende valley. Swamp vegetation and biotope.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Stream valley landscape of the Lende valley. Swamp vegetation and biotope.
-
- Nomination Entrance gate to Fort de Salses, Salses-le-Château, France. --Palauenc05 02:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:10, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grinding stone in Fort de Salses, Salses-le-Château, France. --Palauenc05 02:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sentry box and access to the entrance building of Fort de Salses, Salses-le-Château, France. --Palauenc05 02:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cemetery and western portal wall of the parish church Saint Valentin in Glainach, Ferlach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:29, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, but a pity that the tombstone partially covers the door.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque at the parish church Saint Valentin in Glainach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:29, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:53, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Exterior north wall of the parish church Saint Valentin in Glainach, Ferlach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:29, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crucifix at the cemetery in Glainach, Ferlach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:29, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:55, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sacristy and apse of the parish church Saint Valentin in Glainach, Ferlach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:29, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 02:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dibir Haor Tomb --Wasiul Bahar 02:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Funny motif, just good enough quality. --Palauenc05 02:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish Church of Santa Ana. --Rjcastillo 02:09, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mural in Santiago, Chile. --Rjcastillo 02:09, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tribute to Antonia Salas de Errázuriz, Monument 'To Charity'. --Rjcastillo 02:09, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Palauenc05 02:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lutola 6B soldering iron --Jacek Halicki 00:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination SSD drive Patriot P210 2TB --Jacek Halicki 00:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Havana Club Añejo Especial 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Le torrent de Vella à Saxon en juin 2023. --Espandero 20:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination La tour du château de Saxon vue en juin 2023. --Espandero 20:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination La chapelle du château de Saxon en juin 2023. --Espandero 20:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Nice! --Frank Schulenburg 22:13, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination fr:Saint-Étienne 2023 flea market, France --Touam 14:56, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Semi transparent cabin divider at Passenger Experience Week 2023 in Hamburg --MB-one 13:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Contre-jour view of ECB tower, Frankfurt, at dawn --MB-one 13:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ParisTaras 14:54, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grandrieu (Sivry-Rance-Belgium) - Church of Saint-Quentin, stained-glass window representing Jesus Christ on the Mount of Olives. --Jmh2o 12:40, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ParisTaras 14:54, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hémérocalle, Daylily --Paulparadis 11:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Motherboard ASUS Digital Home P5W DH Deluxe --Alex P. Kok 09:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aufnahme in der Bordelumer Heide; Spiegelung in den Gewässern der teilweise Heidelandschaft. Bordelumer Heide an der Bundesstraße 5 in Richtung Niebüll by User:Kia-Bente --Nightflyer 08:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Not sharp enough. CAs too obvious. --Milseburg 12:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 5 Strada Iuliu Valaori, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 08:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:44, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spiny plumeless thistle (Carduus acanthoides) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 07:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:44, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maxima clam (Tridacna maxima), Red Sea, Egypt --Poco a poco 06:58, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blackstripe cardinalfish (Ostorhinchus nigrofasciatus), Red Sea, Egypt --Poco a poco 06:58, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jeweled anemone hermit crab (Dardanus gemmatus) with sea anemones (Calliactis polypus), Red Sea, Egypt --Poco a poco 06:58, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Test of a sea urchin (Tripneustes sp.), Red Sea, Egypt --Poco a poco 06:58, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Jardin des Senteurs, Rue Jules et Fernand Delcenserie, in Marcq-en-Barœul, France --Velvet 06:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marcq-en-Barœul Music Conservatory, Avenue de la République 929, in Marcq-en-Barœul, France --Velvet 06:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stumbling block dedicated to Else Zivi
--F. Riedelio 06:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Stumbling block dedicated to Else Zivi
-
- Nomination Stumbling block dedicated to Walter Zivi
--F. Riedelio 06:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Stumbling block dedicated to Walter Zivi
-
- Nomination Stumbling block dedicated to Max Kirschbaum
--F. Riedelio 06:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC) - Decline
Oppose Lacks sharpness, sorry --Poco a poco 06:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Stumbling block dedicated to Max Kirschbaum
-
- Nomination New station in Eggolsheim --Ermell 05:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blown off fruit principle of a sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa). Focus stack of 61 photos.
--Famberhorst 05:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Blown off fruit principle of a sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa). Focus stack of 61 photos.
-
- Nomination Restoration Prinses Margriettunnel Work area for the repair of the broken anchors which are supposed to hold the tunnel troughs in place. (piling rig)
--Famberhorst 05:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:58, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination Restoration Prinses Margriettunnel Work area for the repair of the broken anchors which are supposed to hold the tunnel troughs in place. (piling rig)
-
- Nomination Stoney Littleton Long Barrow --Mike Peel 05:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Minutes of the meetings of the Council of the Royal Society --Mike Peel 05:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shell of a true whelk, Buccinulum littorinoides --Llez 05:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Giant hogweed south of the street “Waldmühle” in Schleswig, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany --XRay 04:39, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Süderholmstraße in Schleswig, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany --XRay 04:39, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reconstruction of the site of the inner German border in Mödlareuth, Germany (renewed since around 2020). --PantheraLeo1359531 17:26, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:14, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 13 Strada C. A. Rosetti, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 18:22, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 15:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Open wing Basking posture of Sarangesa dasahara (Moore, 1866) - Common Small Flat --Sandipoutsider 09:34, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MIGORMCZ 21:54, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Open wing Basking posture of Sarangesa dasahara (Moore, 1866) - Common Small Flat --Sandipoutsider 09:31, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MIGORMCZ 21:54, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close wing Basking of Zizeeria karsandra (Moore, 1865) - Dark Grass Blue WLB --Anitava Roy 08:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, not sharp enough --MB-one 20:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Seagulls at Downsview Park --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
poor file name --Charlesjsharp 14:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Comment Status set to "Promotion" again. Please oppose and send to CR if you wish to do so (or just have the image renamed), but the image should not be reverted to "Nomination" for such a long time. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: William Goscombe John: Memorial to the Engine Room Heroes of the Titanic --Mike Peel 20:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Flock of guineafowl in Mole National Park, West Gonja, Ghana --MB-one 13:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Chandra Taal is a lake in the Lahul part of the Lahul and Spiti district of Himachal Pradesh, IndiaI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Sammandi 07:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Espandero 20:25, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New fire station in Fitjar, Norway. --Vasmar1 18:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. An image with the door open will be useful --Tagooty 02:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Thank you, i will try that the next time I'm around there and they have the door open. :) --Vasmar1 05:35, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Support The comment by Vasmar1 undid my Promotion, so am redoing it --Tagooty 06:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Storeknut passing Austevollshella. --Vasmar1 18:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
A good ship image that could be improved by correcting ccw tilt, a slight de-hazing and an overall tighter crop to the ship. --GRDN711 14:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Tilted and cropped. I googled the de-hazing part, seems like Canon DPP4 doesn't support that. Might have to take this nomination back. --Vasmar1 17:11, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Support You have addressed the main issues. I use the de-haze tool in Lightroom as being useful for images where the morning mist gets past the UV filter. --GRDN711 19:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Thank you, I tried Darktable after your advice, the dehazing was really great, but the struggle of editing the other parts in the same way as i do in DPP4 (different ways to do things), it's not worth the struggle. I will absolutely look into if Lightroom is worth the cost! Thanks again. --Vasmar1 08:07, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Support Promoted by GRDN711, my comment reset the promotion. --Vasmar1 14:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta) eating a piece of fruit at Perth Zoo, Western Australia --Calistemon 01:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry: Truncated object (tail cut off), disturbing luminance noise and unfavorable image composition (black snout against a black background). --F. Riedelio 06:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bulldog News, University District, Seattle --Another Believer 15:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry: Low perspective distortion perspective distortion, too low sharpness for QI, level of detail is too low. --F. Riedelio 06:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tate & Lyle building, London.--Alexander-93 08:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 05:57, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View over the Evasion Mont Blanc skiing resort, Saint-Gervais-les-Bains --MB-one 08:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Tag as unassessed Quality Image Candidate rejected on 6. November 2020. --F. Riedelio 05:54, 28 June 2023 (UTC) Support Unassessed images can nominated again. This one is OK for QI, I think. --Milseburg 12:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Handball Women, EL Final4 2023: Madeleine Hilby (Thüringer HC, 9). By --Stepro 19:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Crop for me too tight, you got an other variant? --Grunpfnul 16:28, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
No. In this pic I wanted to show her facial expression, and not her pigtail. --Stepro 20:37, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Support Good enough IMO --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:08, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Barred window at the parish church Queen of the Rosary on Oberer Kirchenweg #10 in Augsdorf, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:29, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Verinag Valley in Jammu and Kashmir, India --UnpetitproleX 12:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Review I suggest another crop or to switch the very right frame. --Milseburg 14:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
@Milseburg: Done cropped. --UnpetitproleX 08:58, 19 June 2023 (UTC) The very right edge is still unsharp.--Milseburg 17:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
@Milesburg: cropped further ~~~~ Please fix the few issues in the marked area. --Milseburg 14:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Lendevallei._Natuurgebied_van_It_Fryske_Gea._29-05-2023._(d.j.b)_05.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Stream valley landscape of the Lende valley. Swamp vegetation and biotope.
--Famberhorst 04:45, 26 June 2023 (UTC) - Decline
- Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:00, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Blurry areas and oversharpening unfortunately. --Tomer T 13:30, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry: Motion blur, level of detail Level of detail too low too low for QI . --F. Riedelio 09:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: it is a Long exposure photo (4 sec.). Then you deliberately create blur in the planting. But not everyone likes that.--Famberhorst 15:41, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral an interesting attempt to use long exposure in landscape photography. However, I find that the exposure time was actually still too short, so that the probably desired blur effect has not become clear enough and actually looks more like camera shake. This could be a great picture if you could catch a moment when, for example, the water surface is very quiet, so the water lilies(?) would be in focus and sharp, while the vegetation around them would be in motion. --Smial 15:49, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:42, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Hotel_de_Rolland_in_Carcassonne_(3).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Hôtel de Rolland in Carcassonne, Aude, France. --Tournasol7 06:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Tagooty 11:13, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose The technical quality is good, indeed, but the photographing angle is too acute for me (I assume that the street is quite narrow, where frontal images would not cover the whole facade), sorry --PantheraLeo1359531 12:58, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Support Good to me. --Sebring12Hrs 13:25, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Support Good to me, too. -- Ikan Kekek 05:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Seal_of_the_Defense_Contract_Management_Agency.svg
[edit]- Nomination SVG seal of a U.S. Department of Defense agency --痛 02:44, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose OC(the real author) is not commons wikimedia user. of course it is looking good, but it is what it is. --Modern primat 10:59, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Info I may not have DESIGNED the seal, but I certainly spent 1 hour vectorizing it. Just like how I do not have to be a building's architect to submit photos of the building here. --痛 13:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Info I may not have DESIGNED the seal, but I certainly spent 1 hour vectorizing it. Just like how I do not have to be a building's architect to submit photos of the building here. --痛 13:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Support Well executed and vectorized by a Wikimedian. --MB-one 14:11, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Support by MB-one. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:09, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Support per MB-one --LexKurochkin 09:14, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Question What are the Commons guidelines in these kinds of situations? -- Ikan Kekek 06:21, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: AFAIK there is no specific guideline ATM, but photographic reproduction of 2D artwork by Commons users is eligible. So I don't see why this type of reproduction shouldn't be. --MB-one 10:51, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- I think there should be a discussion about the guidelines for these kinds of images somewhere. -- Ikan Kekek 05:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Seagulls_at_Downsview_Park_07.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Ring Billed Gulls --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Head of sea gull is hidden. Given the number of sea gull images in Commons, most of which are collecting digital dust, QC images must well-illustrate the species or an aspect of species behavior to have value for Wikimedia Commons and other projects. --GRDN711 14:58, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- This is about technical quality not Commons:Valued images, regardless of the commonness of the subject, and all aspects of a bird are relevant for different purposes. I am Neutral about the quality of this bird; it's sharp but since it's not a headshot I would have preferred for the whole body to be sharp (smaller aperture). --Trougnouf (talk) 13:11, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment This is consideration of image value in QI evaluations. Per COM:QIC guidelines on Value - “Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.” Photographers need to bring their images of best quality at all levels for QI consideration. Just another seagull image, even if it is technically acceptable, is not enough. There must be a belief that this image is publishable in Wikimedia projects or outside use. Sorry, but I don't see that in this image. --GRDN711 23:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- This is about technical quality not Commons:Valued images, regardless of the commonness of the subject, and all aspects of a bird are relevant for different purposes. I am Neutral about the quality of this bird; it's sharp but since it's not a headshot I would have preferred for the whole body to be sharp (smaller aperture). --Trougnouf (talk) 13:11, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose composition. Charlesjsharp 15:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per Charlesjsharp. If cropped to a meaningful view, the resolution and sharpness become too low and the result is no more usable for an acceptable A4 size print. No problem with the hidden head, there may be someone outside or inside wikimedia projekts, who needs such a view in good quality. --Smial 11:24, 27 June 2023 (UTC)