Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 23 2023

• 
  • Nomination Stone carved with symbols. --Rjcastillo 03:51, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Unterdellach and the Mittagskogel in the Karawanks mountain-range in the background, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Telephone booth on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parkhotel on Hans-Pruscha-Weg #5, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Watchtower and walkways in the former arsenal in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oak at the heart pond in the wildlife park in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arcades of the Nieuwe Kerk inMiddelburg, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 03:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cannons at the entrance to the port, Veere, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 03:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the beach to the Western Scheldt, Zoutelande, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 03:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Dimitsana. --C messier 20:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:38, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Taxiarches in Dimitsana, Arcadia. --C messier 20:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:38, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ancient walls within Dimitsana, Arcadia. --C messier 20:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mazda CX-60 PHEV in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 20:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. May be better with more space around. --XRay 03:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Art Deco building, Rue Racine 90, in Lille, France --Velvet 17:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ambigram of the word "ফারিন" (Farin in Bengali Script) by MS Sakib. -- MS Sakib (talk)16:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination War memorial (stone) by Aristide Maillol in Banyuls-sur-Mer, France. --Palauenc05 16:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination AEV Brute in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 16:08, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House with a sailor's pompom in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 14:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ezarate 15:53, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Deutsche Basketball-Bundesliga 2022/23, 13th day of play: ALBA Berlin vs. Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt (99:74) – Justin Onyejiaka (Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt) --Sandro Halank 14:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:15, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Deutsche Basketball-Bundesliga 2022/23, 13th day of play: ALBA Berlin vs. Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt (99:74) – Quantez Robertson (Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt) --Sandro Halank 14:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Deutsche Basketball-Bundesliga 2022/23, 13th day of play: ALBA Berlin vs. Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt (99:74) – Alexander Richardson (Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt) --Sandro Halank 14:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:15, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Deutsche Basketball-Bundesliga 2022/23, 13th day of play: ALBA Berlin vs. Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt (99:74) – Justin Onyejiaka (Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt) --Sandro Halank 14:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Deutsche Basketball-Bundesliga 2022/23, 13th day of play: ALBA Berlin vs. Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt (99:74) – Matt Haarms (Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt) --Sandro Halank 14:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:15, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Garland flower (Daphne cneorum) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:45, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Polittico Quaratesi, Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 12:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:12, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Annunciation by Simone Martini and Lippo Memmi, Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 12:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Diptych of Federico da Montefeltro and Battista Sforza, Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 12:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination San Romano Battle by Paolo Uccello, Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 12:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View over a couple of trees and another building to the Uptown in Munich --FlocciNivis 09:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Platforms and trains in Bamberg station --Ermell 09:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pfister bridge and tracks south of Bamberg station --Ermell 09:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Glass roof of the Wandelhalle in the Atrium shopping center in Bamberg --Ermell 09:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Staircase in the Atrium shopping center in Bamberg --Ermell 09:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hospital corridor in the “Marienhaus Klinikum Hetzelstift“
    --F. Riedelio 08:50, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Epilepsiezentrum Kork, view from south
    --F. Riedelio 08:50, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The University Hospital Mannheim viewed from the telecommunication tower
    --F. Riedelio 08:50, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Left valve of a Lyrate Asiatic Hard Clam, Meretrix lyrata --Llez 07:55, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dresdner Eierschecke (by Brücke-Osteuropa) --RudolfSchreier 07:48, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Too noisy, poor focus and crop --A.Savin 15:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture of Saints Cyril and Methodius (Prague) --Scotch Mist 07:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:25, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Saint John the Baptist (Prague) --Scotch Mist 07:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:54, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Saint John the Baptist Detail (Prague) --Scotch Mist 07:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:24, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower van Spannenburg next to the Prinses Margriet Canal
    --Famberhorst 06:11, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion I know this tower, good quality --Michielverbeek 06:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
    Ik zag dat je er geweest bent. Hier is het bewijs. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Spannenburg,_de_toren_van_Spannenburg_IMG_2678a_2018-04-19_15.04.jpg --Famberhorst 06:54, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at Carrer del Bisbe Torras i Bages 6 in Vic, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Edifici de la Llotja in Vic, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Teresa church in Vic, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roman temple in Vic, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:07, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portal of the church of Pieta in Vic, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Traditional barn at Waltensburg/Vuorz.
    
  • Promotion --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC) Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Waltensburg/Vuorz, Switzerland. Ruin Casti Mint Sorn Gieri (Burg Jörgenberg) and surroundings.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:48, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alp da Schlans 1760m. Mountain lake Lag da Schlans.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Forest in the Baumberge (Baumberge nature reserve, COE-074), Nottuln, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Mind-blowing Exposure --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cathedral in Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower “Lange Jan” of the Nieuwe Kerk in Middelburg, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 04:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Groynes at the beach, Zoutelande, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 04:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neptune Fountain side view. --Rjcastillo 04:11, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Views at Anhui Huangshan. By User:Miaulian --Q28 03:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Nice motif. Sorry, not sharp enough. It looks like downsized too. --XRay 05:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fairmont Le Château Frontenac --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Burnt sky. Sorry. --Ermell 09:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
    @Ermell: Thanks for the rreview. Tried to fix it is it better now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Opel Movano C in Esslingen.--Alexander-93 19:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion A bit tight at right but Good quality. --Cayambe 17:42, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The church of Saint Tryphon, Vytina. --C messier 19:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Nativity of Mary in Vytina. --C messier 19:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, nice composition --FlocciNivis 09:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gurabija (гурабија,Qurabiya) --PetarM 18:43, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:50, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yellow pencil whit eraser --Boaventuravinicius 18:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too noisy. Better lighting should have been used --FlocciNivis 09:50, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Suzuki Jimny in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 17:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 17:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lemon sorbet with peppermint leaves (Mentha × piperita)
    --F. Riedelio 17:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ice cubes in Aperol Spritz
    --F. Riedelio 17:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Nothing is really sharp. Sorry. --Ermell 09:42, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• * Nomination Stuffed toy in the birth center of the “Marienhaus Klinikum Hetzelstift“ --F. Riedelio 17:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Nomination Stuffed toy in the birth center of the “Marienhaus Klinikum Hetzelstift“
    --F. Riedelio 17:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the other side of the Saar to the vineyard Würtzberg --FlocciNivis 16:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 17:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ancient Roman relief, Musei Capitolini, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 16:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    I don't know why the bottom looks blurry, also there's some noise maybe. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
    I reworked it --Poco a poco 21:00, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
     Support It's much better thank you. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ancient roman statue of Titus, Musei Capitolini, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 16:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    There's a bit noise in the shadows. It's easily removable. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
    Didn't look to me like a must given the file size, but I applied some denoising --Poco a poco 21:00, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
     Support It's much better thank you. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chestnut Tailed Starling --Fabian Roudra Baroi 16:54, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose no definition --Charlesjsharp 16:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common Myna --Fabian Roudra Baroi 16:54, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose no definition --Charlesjsharp 16:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Scene from a roller derby jam in Berlin 2018 --MB-one 18:55, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Picturesque view of Rue Girardon in Paris --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
     Comment Please remember to sign your nominations so that we know who we provide feedback to and we know the date and time they have been published. Also, please remember to nominate no more than 5 images per day. I'd suggest to withdraw 4 of the 9 nominations and publish them tomorrow. --Lion-hearted85 19:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Gate of no. 9 in Rond-point des Champs-Élysées-Marcel-Dassault, Paris --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
     Comment See notice above. --Lion-hearted85 19:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Door of no. 35 on Rue Étienne-Marcel, Paris --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
     Comment See notice above. --Lion-hearted85 19:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Ceiling of the stairs hall in the Suțu Palace --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
     Comment See notice above. --Lion-hearted85 19:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Peristyle of the Grand Trianon --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
     Comment See notice above. --Lion-hearted85 19:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Stone vase in the Gardens of the Palace of Versailles --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
     Comment See notice above. --Lion-hearted85 19:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Neoclassical palmettes of the fence of the Panthéon in Paris --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
     Comment See notice above. --Lion-hearted85 19:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Building no. 15 on Avenue de l'Opéra, Paris --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
     Comment See notice above. --Lion-hearted85 19:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Interior of the Salon du glacier in the Opéra Garnier --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
     Comment See notice above. --Lion-hearted85 19:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Cloître monastère San Lazzaro décembre 2022. --Benoît Prieur 19:05, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose IMHO, too soft (strong NR?) --C messier 20:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The death march cenotaph in Obermenzing --FlocciNivis 10:20, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --C messier 20:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Vyborg fortress, drone picture --Красный 15:13, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Try to correct the perspective. --A.Savin 15:18, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Common_Iora,_Khulna_03.jpg

• Nomination Common Iora --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:43, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:56, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose not enough detail/sharpness --Charlesjsharp 16:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  @Charlesjsharp: Thanks for the opinion, I tried to improve it Is it better now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:32, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Fabian, if you present a bird to QI it should have detail. You were too far away (or you needed more mm) to achieve that Poco a poco 16:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  @Poco a poco: Thanks for the opinion Diego. I'll keep it in mind. Actually the bird was too small and I had a 70-300mm. It was taken at 300mm.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles. Also too noisy, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 22:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Wood_Duck,_Highpark_38.jpg

• Nomination The Wood Duck --Fabian Roudra Baroi 18:07, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
• Promotion
  Quite noisy (as expected from the high ISO) and a bit posterisation at the legs. Fixable? --C messier 20:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC)@C messier: Tried to fixed it. Is it better now?
   Oppose noise --Charlesjsharp 16:51, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  @Charlesjsharp: Tried to improve it, how is it now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:13, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

• Better but loss of definition. Thing on the right detracts. Charlesjsharp 16:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
   Support ΙΜΗΟ, it is OK for QI. --C messier 20:25, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

 Support Lovely colours and mood. Quality good enough. --Tagooty 04:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Acceptable as an overall composition, per others. -- Ikan Kekek 17:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 20:01, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Basílica_de_Santa_María_Novella,_Florencia,_Italia,_2022-09-19,_DD_45.jpg

• Nomination Santa Maria Novella, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 15:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 20:17, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose IMHO, tilted CW and the right side is leaning out. --C messier 21:09, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Fixed Poco a poco 19:12, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support OK. --C messier 20:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 20:01, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Ship M.V. Shahed-3 (Fatema Shipping Lines) spotted in The Sundarban 12.jpg

• Nomination Ship spotted near The Sundarbans --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
  Photo is not categorized correctly. --Mike1979 Russia 13:12, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
   Done Thanks for the review Mike1979 Russia, I have changed the category of the picture, let me know if there's anything more I can do--Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:45, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
   Support Good quality. --Wasiul Bahar 15:59, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
  Ship categorized by she's name. Please, see Category:Ships --Mike1979 Russia 06:23, 10 January 2023
  @Mike1979 Russia: Can you please explain further, I couldn't get you? If you meant ship's name , I'm not sure because these are the small ships that mainly travel through the rivers. Also, I couldn't find a category with the name thats written on the ship. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 06:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)(UTC)

@Fabian Roudra Baroi: You should create ship's category with her name according rules. Info about ship you can find in inland maritime authorities of Bangladesh. But I can't help you in searching because I don't undestand begali. --Mike1979 Russia (talk) 07:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
@Mike1979 Russia: Thanks, for the suggestions. I almost searched for more than 3 years in the govt. websites, I found the list for international water but not the inland. Would you be able to assist me in a meeting ?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose Too dark, unfortunate crop (too much of the grey sky), and the ship should be identified (IMO No.) --Palauenc05 09:26, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
  @Palauenc05:  Done Thanks for the review, I reedited the picture according to your review. Also, these are the domestic ships which only travel through domestic rivers, I'm not sure if they have IMO or not. Can you please give me more details? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 15:24, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overprocessed. Blurred and oversharpened at the same time. Editing the tonal values increased the image noise and led to additional artifacts. --Smial 12:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
  @Smial: Thanks for the review. I uploaded another version with reduced grain, the shutter speed of this picture is 1/1000 so its sharp also a little bit grainy. I used a higher shutter speed because I was in a moving boat so lower shutter speed could have made it blurry. Also, I was not in a parallel line with the ship and I focused on the front of the ship, thats why the front is totally sharp and the back is a little blurry because of the focal point being a little bit far from the back of the ship and also because of using a zoom lens. Please check the first of the pic thats the raw one, then you wont think I over processed cause I just increased the contrast as the picture was little hazy due to heavy fog. Please let me know for any more changes and where did you see the artificats? I will try to recover them. It happens because of the damage in my dslr sensor. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 15:24, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Sorry, I actually like the composition and the mood but I agree with Smial, it seems like noise reduction has been overused which has led to a sort of smudgy look, and then tried to pull this back with the sharpness slider. A bit of noise/grain isn't necessarily an issue, definitely preferable to overprocessing IMO. BigDom 11:18, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
  • @BigDom: I really appreciate it, can you please check the first version that I uploaded. Thats the raw one and guide me what edits should be done on that.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 15:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
    • I honestly think your current version is pretty good, the colours etc on the boat seem OK to me (they're always going to a bit muted due to the misty weather) and the focus is fine. I would have just probably used a little less noise correction, and then it shouldn't need so much additional sharpening. I would maybe crop still more of the sky out than what you've already done too (maybe try a more 'widescreen' aspect ratio like 16:10?). BigDom 16:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
      • @BigDom: Thank you so much for the Ratio, it really looks better now. Is the sharpening and noise reduction ok now? Sharpening amount 20 out of 150 and Noise Reduction amount 10 out of 100 in Lightroom. I sharpened it a bit because the back part is little blurry --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:55, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
      •  Comment The very first "RAW" version did not have excessive noise that would bother me. --Smial 11:49, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
        • I think the new version is much better. Happy to  Support now. BigDom 14:37, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment I keep my oppose vote, as the file description is not satisfactory, esp. the identification of the ship (whether it*s domestic or not). See guidelines No. 3: "...an accurate description on the file page". --Palauenc05 13:11, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  @Palauenc05: I'm trying to find more information, I have searched all of the govt websites. Rather than opposing it would be better if you can help me find--Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment @ Fabian Roudra Baroi: My oppose vote doesn't play a role anyway, as the majority supports that nomination, although an important criterion is not fulfilled. I can't help you much in this case as I'm not an expert on ships. However, you should at least mention the information you have, such as the name of the ship and its (registration?) number. If it helps you, I can then scratch my vote. --Palauenc05 16:29, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  @Palauenc05: Thank you so much. I'm not sure about its registration, I'll try to input as much as I can see from the ship itself.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:43, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment I added the name of the ship as it appears at the bow, but I couldn't find its IMO (maybe it doesn't have one). --C messier 13:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  @C messier: Thank you so much I appreciate it. I almost researched for more than 3 hours on Ship-related govt. websites and lists. I found the international ship list but only the statistics for inland ships. Also, there's a 5digit no at the bow I tried to research about it on google couldn't find anything --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:43, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment I've added the ship owner company, too. --Palauenc05 12:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Good enough, per others. -- Ikan Kekek 20:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 20:00, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Saltwater_Crocodiles_of_Sundarbans_03.jpg

• Nomination Saltwater Crocodiles of Sundarbans --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:35, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Looks overprocessed to me and please, don't overcategorize, see COM:OVERCAT --Poco a poco 11:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

•  Done Thanks for the review @Poco a poco, I have adjusted the category, also I removed my texture editing and reduced the sharpness and vibrance. Let me know if any more changes needed to be done.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:45, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

• An improvement, specially looking at the teeth but the texture of the skin still looks overprocessed --Poco a poco 20:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
  @Poco a poco:  New version uploaded. I mainly played with lights, whites, blacks and sharpness. In lightroom, I've decreased the whites, shadows and increased the blacks. Also increased the sharpness and noise reduction. Let me know what should be changed. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:43, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

• Not really an improvement to me, sorry Poco a poco 15:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

• @Poco a poco: IT would be better if you suggest me what settings should I change rather than just saying not an improvement. Also, Thats the natural skin of that crocodile with little mud on its face and body. If you want I can send you the raw picture.

• Not so easy, there are different reasons why an image could look overprocessed, I don't know what settings you have used here. I can offer to give it a try if you send me the RAW file. Poco a poco 09:27, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

• @Poco a poco: I really appreciate, it would be my honor to learn from you. Kindly please check the mail that you attached with your userpage.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 17:09, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. -- Wasiul Bahar 18:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Info Uploaded a new version edited by @Poco a poco--Fabian Roudra Baroi ( talk) 20:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC)