Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 12 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Open_Wing_Basking_of_Phalanta_phalantha_(Drury,_1773)_-_Common_Leopard_WLB_DSC_3139.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Open Wing Basking of Phalanta phalantha (Drury, 1773) - Common Leopard. This specimen belongs to sub species Phalanta phalantha phalantha (Drury, [1773]) – Oriental Common Leopard in India.This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 17:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality (added the species category). --C messier 21:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose I disagree. Lack of detail, bluish artifacts left wing near the top. Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support. I see no lack. Good quality to me. -- Spurzem 17:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
     Comment I may be wrong. Essentially all images of this species, including several QIs, look unusually blurry, without any trace of scales (except for the wing edges) and with very blurry or even entirely missing hairs on the body. However, look at the brightly colored dots everywhere. Blue dots in the black areas on the wings, yellow, light blue and reddish dots on the body, especially in the lower thorax and upper abdomen. The tip of the abdomen looks like it is fused to the lower left wing. If you look at the edge of the upper left wing, you can see greyish-blue areas that separate a part of the light orange scales protruding from the outer edge of the wing from the rest of the wing. All of this may just the result of the substandard monitor I am looking at, but serious overprocessing looks like a much more likely cause with an ISO of 3,200 and hardly any visible noise. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:54, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Robert Flogaus-Faust. Whether it's the butterfly or the leaves, it's not very sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 01:31, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Robert Flogaus-Faust. --Tagooty 08:43, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Over-processed and nowhere near QI. Charlesjsharp 10:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others, massively overprocessed, originally noisy high-ISO picture. --Plozessor 17:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --C messier 21:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)