Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 25 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Salamandra_atra_Bizau_02.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Alpine Salamander (Salamandra atra) near Bizau in the Bregenz Forest, Vorarlberg, Austria --Uoaei1 04:57, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:09, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
    not much in focus though --Charlesjsharp 14:42, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
    Needs to be set to "Discuss" in case of different opinions --Uoaei1 12:54, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
     Support - Front of the salamander is very sharp at a larger-than-life full resolution. I think that's quite enough of a reason to promote this photo. -- Ikan Kekek 05:29, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality --Billy (talk) 11:47, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 15:48, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Great_Barbet_(Megalaima_virens)_(न्याउली).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bird Name: Great Barbet, Scientific Name: Megalaima virens, Nepali Name: Nauli (न्याउली) in Godhawari Botanical Garden. --Nirmal Dulal 06:52, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:27, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose too dark --Charlesjsharp 15:36, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
     Weak support Looks okay to me. Only problem I have is that it seems like it's focused to the belly of the bird. --GerifalteDelSabana 23:57, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality --Billy (talk) 11:48, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 15:48, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Maison_des_têtes_-_statue_du_tonnelier_alsacien_(Colmar).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Statue of the Alsatian cooper in 19 rue des Têtes in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 14:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too dark --Charlesjsharp 15:36, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose not very sharp, and severe CAs --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:59, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per --Uoaei1 --Billy69150 11:41, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 15:47, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Schloss_Stetten_(Seite).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Schloss Stetten in Kernen im Remstal, Germany. --Laserlicht 00:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Distorted. --Seven Pandas 01:20, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Easy to fix. That shouldn't be a reason for declining --Ermell 08:36, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perspective, and somewhat greenish WB. Very small remains of CA is tolerable imho. --Smial 11:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
  •  Info Optimized color, perspective and CA --Laserlicht 02:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment You should fix the verticals on the left side as well.--Ermell 20:25, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
  • @Billy69150: In order for the bot to complete the job, you have to change the "Discuss" to "Promotion" or "Decline" depending on the result of the vote.--Peulle 09:54, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Billy69150 11:43, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

File:2012_Powiat_pszczyński,_Studzionka,_Kościół_Wniebowzięcia_NMP_(06).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Church of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Studzionka, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 21:24, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality, top of the churchtower sharp enough for me for Q1 --Michielverbeek 22:42, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. IMO the sky is too dark. --Tournasol7 23:55, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done New version uploaded. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 15:53, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
    Thank you very much, It's good now. Tournasol7 20:48, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment - I took a look. The upper sky is a bit blotchy. Could you smooth it out? If so, I'd be likely to support. -- Ikan Kekek 00:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Ok, I made denoise of the sky. Please take a look again. --Halavar 19:06, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Thanks.  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 19:18, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support--Ermell 22:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
  • @Billy69150: In order for the bot to complete the job, you have to change the "Discuss" to "Promotion" or "Decline" depending on the result of the vote.--Peulle 09:53, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Billy69150 11:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)