Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 10 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Saint_John_United_Methodist_Church,_Augusta_GA,_Northeast_view_20160703_1.jpg

[edit]

File:2016._Fonte_no_Barco_de_Valdeorras._Galiza.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Fountain. O Barco de Valdeorras, Galicia (Spain).--Lmbuga 21:06, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Confounding background, sorry --Moroder 21:53, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - I disagree. I like the shapes of the building in the background and the fountain, and the image quality itself is pretty clearly good enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 22:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
  • I'll elaborate: We're looking at a Modernist fountain, so it's appropriate for the background not to be the conventional view of a building but a view of parts of the building that emphasizes their abstract shapes. I quite like this and could almost imagine it as an out-of-the-box FP nom (though probably too unconventional to pass there). -- Ikan Kekek 22:35, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support The background is a bit disturbing, but the fountain is placed in a real environment so unless you want to bring a huge cardboard background to the location, it is what it is. The photo quality is OK for QI.--Peulle 17:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support --Livioandronico2013 20:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support --Cvmontuy 13:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 14:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

File:BenzingerodeMenhir_20170128c_PtrQs.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Menhir near Benzingerode, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany --PtrQs 01:27, 04 Fabruary 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality --Llez 05:18, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
  • For now  Oppose: please crop a bit more of the sky. --A.Savin 03:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - I would support cropping more of the sky, but I think this is a perfectly fine QI as is. -- Ikan Kekek 06:39, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support I'm agree with Ikan Kekek--Lmbuga 14:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted Peulle 14:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)