Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 18 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Binnenhof,_The_Hague_-hu-1802.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Binnenhof, The Hague. By User:Hubertl --XRay 18:04, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Distortion and CA in upper left --Daniel Case 20:45, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 Support Good enough for me now. Daniel Case 02:12, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done I repaired the distortions, no significant CA found. No reason for declining, when a comment - as a common practice - would be enough. --Hubertl 21:49, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
    • "common practice" discussible IMO...btw, could you crop out the bottom shadow maybe ?--Jebulon 22:53, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
    thanks for the last hint, Jebulon, ✓ Done --Hubertl 10:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
     Support Better IMO.--Jebulon 14:48, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 15:44, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 16:28, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Jean11 00:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Museo_de_Historia_de_y_de_Navegación,_Riga,_Letonia,_2012-08-07,_DD_01.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Museum of the History and Navigation, Riga, Latvia --Poco a poco 16:52, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose A little too much CA; turret seems too distorted --Daniel Case 05:58, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I introduced some improvements, should be fine for QI now, please, let's discuss. --Poco a poco 18:03, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 Comment Everything is leaning to the right. --SkywalkerPL 08:44, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ New version Poco a poco 10:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 10:23, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose the turret should be vertical.--Jebulon 22:56, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
    Jebulon: I don't understand this comment, I can do that, but the picture wouldn't look realistic at all, that's why I applied only some correction but stopped before it got streched out like a sausage Poco a poco 13:37, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
    • So, you don't agree, but you understand very well Clin--Jebulon 21:08, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 07:10, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Rear view of Notre-Dame-des-Pommiers.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination: Cathedral of Sisteron, France --KL KL 11:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:06, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry but need adjustment perspective for me--Livioandronico2013 12:09, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment ✓ Done --KL KL 13:14, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Jean11 00:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Insufficient correction.--Jebulon 20:13, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment Could you be more specific please? What doesn't seem ok to you? Thanks in advance. --KL KL (talk) 20:05, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
      • La fenêtre de droite devrait être strictement verticale, à mon avis.--Jebulon 21:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sky's still unusually dark. Daniel Case 20:29, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment Sorry but I don't understand your comment. You say "still" which seems to refer to a previous comment but it is the first comment on that picture. Moreover I don't find it surprising that the sky is dark. Please bear in mind that the picture is taken at noon during the summer and the church is white (therefore very bright, shot at f/10 1/500s). For instance this FI of the Parthenon shot in somewhat similar conditions also has a dark sky --KL KL (talk) 20:05, 16 August 2015 (UTC).
  •  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 12:25, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 07:09, 17 August 2015 (UTC)