Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 12 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Sign_Mfuwe_Secondary_School_Zambia_Jul23_A7C_06277.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Sign on main road, Mfuwe Day Secondary School, Mfuwe, Eastern Province --Tagooty 02:09, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose I wish I would be able to see the bottom legs of the sign and center the entire sign in the photo. --Relativity 03:12, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
    •  Info To me, the composition is good with sufficient of the legs shown. Let's hear other opinions, please. --Tagooty 04:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
      •  Comment The composition looks strange to me. Both tighter crop and crop showing the sign completely, including the legs, would be better. For tighter crop perspective correction and tilt correction will be needed. --LexKurochkin 10:47, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:02, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Wiwersheim,_l'église_Saint-Cyriaque_IMG_5496_2023-05-08_12.57.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wiwersheim in France, church: l'église Saint-Cyriaque --Michielverbeek 06:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose. I think the picture is much too dark. Perhaps it is possible to lighten the building so that more can be seen. As it is now, it is not a quality image for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 16:39, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Underexposed per Spurzem. -- Ikan Kekek 05:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree per Spurzem and Ikan. --GRDN711 14:05, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Not so dark, but perspective correction is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 07:13, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:58, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Sant'agnese_in_agone_cappella.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination cappella di San Sebastiano in santa Agnese in agone (Roma) --GattoCeliaco 16:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline  Support The image looks kinda mushy, the highlights on the staues face are a bit overshooting and it looks like it could need slight perspective correction. However, IMHO the composition is good and the other things are not 'bad enough' to not be a QI (#longestPromotionTextEver) --D-Kuru 18:38, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose Not sharp enough to me. -- Ikan Kekek 08:12, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too soft, not sharp enough --Isiwal 12:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice composition, but a strange mixture of heavily over-sharpened and, presumably due to strong noise reduction, completely blurred picture elements - right next to each other. --Smial 14:47, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. --LexKurochkin 10:39, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:58, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Wierum_(Noardeast-Fryslân),_10-07-2023._(d.j.b)_04.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wierum (Northeast-Fryslân), View of the Wadden Sea from the seawall. (Breakwaters and mud flats.)
    --Famberhorst 05:09, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  SupportGood quality --Michielverbeek 05:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose WB way off. --Kallerna 09:11, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
    * Question My question.Do you find the WB. too cold?--Famberhorst 16:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

WB off (cold/purple), sharpness, may need perspective correction (noticeable on the horizon in the left half). --Аныл Озташ 20:33, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done. Correction WB.e.d. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst 05:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose The poles on the left half are unfortunately still tilted to the right due to the distortion. --Anil Ö. (talk) 23:12, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Note: The posts are formed by wind and weather. On the right, the piles are propped up with horizontal piles. Work is underway on a recovery plan for the seawall to better protect the coast.--Famberhorst 04:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality, overall, and a good, interesting motif. -- Ikan Kekek 08:30, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support interesting --Isiwal 12:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:25, 11 August 2023 (UTC)