Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 08 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Rat_snakes.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Two male rat snakes showing combat dance in Chitwan national park. uploaded By User:ChillionaireRohitgiri --Skrissh 03:46, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 04:15, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose for now. The genus should be identified at least. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:42, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done category added. --Nirmal Dulal 04:29, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Thanks. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:09, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Needs a better crop. --Kallerna 09:18, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:16, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Personally, I would prefer a closer crop, but still QI. --Аныл Озташ 00:21, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Agree with Аныл Озташ that image would benefit with tighter crop. --GRDN711 02:48, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Maja_e_Shebenikut.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Shebenik peak, Shebenik National Park --Liridon 10:24, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:46, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. The composition failed here with so much empty sky. There is also a spot to fix. --Milseburg 09:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As Milseburg said, too much sky. There are also several dust spots. -- Ikan Kekek 07:10, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Dust spots. --Аныл Озташ 00:19, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 12:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Railway_and_sky_2.jpg[edit]

perspective correction needed --MB-one 18:38, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
@MB-one Ok now?
  •  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:06, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree (low level of detail). --Аныл Озташ 20:16, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice view, but: Noise reduction and post-sharpening fight each other here, which is unfortunately already visible in an A4-size view. Thus, some surfaces look like plastic film. I'm certainly not an Apple fan boy, but that company gets photos better on the iphones. --Smial 10:51, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support: I don't like the background on the right, but it's otherwise good enough to me. -- Ikan Kekek 07:18, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Mostly just sky. --Kallerna 09:19, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Fairly interesting sky, so I think that's an OK artistic license, but of course it's also fine for you to disagree. -- Ikan Kekek 19:01, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --MB-one 11:03, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Castle_of_Bezeril_(1).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Castle of Bézéril, Gers, France. --Tournasol7 20:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment The image seems very orange to me --PantheraLeo1359531 12:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
    I was taken this photo at the golden hour. Tournasol7 16:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good to me. --Sebring12Hrs 08:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
     Support Ermell 22:13, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Plausible color to me, and very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 07:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment The building to the left seems to me to be tilted slightly to the right. --Аныл Озташ 00:17, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:16, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Basilique_Notre_Dame_Garde_-_Marseille_VI_(FR13)_-_2023-07-22_-_14.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Tower of Notre-Dame-de-la-Garde basilica of Marseille, France. --Chabe01 21:37, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline @Chabe01: I would give it a promotion after perspective correction --D-Kuru 16:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment. The perspective is okay for me; because that's how you see the building in reality when you stand close to it. I would, however, like to see the statue from the front. -- Spurzem 12:09, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree with the perspective correction objection, especially looking at the corner of the building on the left. What bothers me here, however, is the low level of detail. --Аныл Озташ 00:09, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --MB-one 12:17, 6 August 2023 (UTC)