Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/James H. Clark Center

James H. Clark Center, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2020 at 02:45:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

• 
  Clark Center from the south
• 
  Clark Center from the east

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
•  Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Both pictures are a bit soft and neither is an FP to me, sorry. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:09, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

  @Ikan Kekek: I'm a bit surprised by your comment. Could you elaborate why you believe the pictures to be soft? They were taken with one of Nikon's sharpest lenses, the 14-24mm f/2.8G, and you can see the detail inside the buildings perfectly fine. The tiling on the ground is rather smooth and textureless, which is why you may perceive it as soft. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Sure, I can see details. These photos are high-level QIs to me. But a lot of the exterior elements of the building aren't crisp to my eyes, but a little diffuse. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

• Maybe because there is no detail in the material to begin with? It's a smooth, polished surface. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

• Maybe, but then I suppose it would be down to the light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:56, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan --StellarHalo (talk) 21:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 23:29, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:13, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Colors look like washed off. Also miss some wow here. --Mile (talk) 12:03, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Cmao20 (talk) 21:16, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:32, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support the first one, "neutral" for the view from the east (composition less striking due to the foreground, cut). If this set fails I would suggest an individual nomination of the view from the south only. Good sharpness in my opinion, nice blue hour -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:28, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:39, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support. Meiræ 22:22, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The images will become FP but I don't understand which criteria is met to present it as a set, so my oppose is rather a formal one. The images are both at FP level to me. Poco a poco (talk) 10:17, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

  @Poco a poco: "A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible." A comprehensive set would be ideal but is not an absolute requirement. The reason I didn't go for a comprehensive set here is that a north view is not possible (see the tree blocking the view in the south image), and a west view would be a mirror image of the east view and thus redundant. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:18, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

• Ok, moving to  Neutral because you just convinced me to 50%. A comprehensive view is indeed what I'd usually expect but I maybe more demanding than the rule, not sure Poco a poco (talk) 20:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:19, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States