Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2020/01

Old World swallowtail

View opposition Nominated by: Fbnpch (talk) on 2013-08-22 15:24 (UTC) Scope: Papilio machaon (Swallowtail) ventral side Used in: de:Schwalbenschwanz; en:Papilio machaon; fr:Papilio machaon  Comment Several problems. There is already an image VI promoted for this scope. The binomial name is always in italics and should be followed in the scope of the common name in English in brackets. The image can be promoted if the scope is reduced to "ventral side". Overall, the scope would be good ''[[Papilio machaon]]'' (Swallowtail) ventral side . Problem with the caption does not give the location of the photograph, it also takes a geocoding.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)  Support Best in rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:43, 23 August 2013 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 27 August 2013 (UTC)  Oppose in favor of the other photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:23, 6 October 2019 (UTC) 1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Schwalbenschwanz (Papilio machaon).jpg: 0 <-- 2. Commons: Valued image candidates/Old World swallowtail (Papilio machaon gorganus) underside Italy.jpg: +1 => 1. File:Schwalbenschwanz (Papilio machaon).jpg : Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- 2. File:Old World swallowtail (Papilio machaon gorganus) underside Italy.jpg : Promoted Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2019-08-21 13:21 (UTC) Scope: Papilio machaon gorganus (Old World swallowtail) underside Reason: existing VI is same subspecies -- Charles (talk)  Support - Sharper and more vivid. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:24, 6 October 2019 (UTC) 1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Schwalbenschwanz (Papilio machaon).jpg: 0 2. Commons: Valued image candidates/Old World swallowtail (Papilio machaon gorganus) underside Italy.jpg: +1<-- => 1. File:Schwalbenschwanz (Papilio machaon).jpg : Declined and demoted to VI-former. 2. File:Old World swallowtail (Papilio machaon gorganus) underside Italy.jpg : Promoted <-- Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Caryatides - Château de Chenonceau

View promotion Nominated by: Gzen92 [discuter] on 2019-09-18 10:23 (UTC) Scope: South-western exposure of the Caryatids in the park of the Castle of Chenonceau  Support - Clearer details. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:26, 6 October 2019 (UTC)  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 6 January 2020 (UTC)  Support - I prefer this photo because the main object is more clearly recognizable. the other photo may be more pleasing, but for example the contrast of the leaves distracts quite a bit from the building.--Arne (talk) 16:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC) 1. Commons: Valued image candidates/Château de Chenonceau - caryatides (Chenonceaux).jpg: +3<-- 2. Commons: Valued image candidates/Caryatides in the park of the Castle of Chenonceau.jpg: +2 => 1. File: Château de Chenonceau - caryatides (Chenonceaux).jpg : Promoted <-- 2. File: Caryatides in the park of the Castle of Chenonceau.jpg : Declined and demoted to VI-former. Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View opposition Nominated by: Tournasol7 (talk) on 2018-07-19 21:34 (UTC) Scope: South-western exposure of the Caryatids in the park of the Castle of Chenonceau Used in: fr:Château de Chenonceau  Comment Caryatides are not green. They are better seen here Château de Chenonceau - 079.jpg --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 20 July 2018 (UTC)  Comment  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 (talk) 15:24, 20 July 2018 (UTC)  Comment No more objection to the color. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 21 July 2018 (UTC)  Support best in scope imo --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:59, 25 July 2018 (UTC)  Comment - Edited out typo: In English, "caryatid" has no "e" on the end. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:49, 26 July 2018 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 27 July 2018 (UTC)  Oppose in favor of the other photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:26, 6 October 2019 (UTC)  Support In favour of this photo. There is little to choose between the detail at 640 px (which is where VIs should be judged, also the colour in this one add to the image as a whole. Martinvl (talk) 21:12, 10 November 2019 (UTC)  Support I favour this image. The sunlight gives deeper contrast, richer colours, and a stronger feeling of depth. --Bobulous (talk) 20:01, 23 November 2019 (UTC)  Oppose In favor of the other photo. --Arne (talk) 16:30, 7 January 2020 (UTC) 1. Commons: Valued image candidates/Château de Chenonceau - caryatides (Chenonceaux).jpg: +3 2. Commons: Valued image candidates/Caryatides in the park of the Castle of Chenonceau.jpg: +2<-- => 1. File: Château de Chenonceau - caryatides (Chenonceaux).jpg  : Promoted - 2. File: Caryatides in the park of the Castle of Chenonceau.jpg : Declined and demoted to VI-former. <- Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Albertson Home

View Nominated by: Jim Evans (talk) on 2021-01-03 19:01 (UTC) Scope: Albertson Home  Support Only in scope, so best. Is this the best possible angle for a photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:53, 4 January 2021 (UTC)  Comment Probably should have shot this on head-on. As I remember, trees prevent shooting from the right. -- Jim Evans (talk) 11:37, 4 January 2021 (UTC)  Comment If you have a chance to get a more complete picture of the house, do an MVP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)  Comment I took and posted the new picture as requested but I still prefer this one. -- Jim Evans (talk) 8:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC) Scores: Albertson Home (Galveston).jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- Albertson Home -- Galveston.jpg: 0 Albertson Home (Galveston).jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- --Jim Evans (talk) 14:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View Nominated by: Jim Evans (talk) on 2021-02-01 17:07 (UTC) Scope: Albertson Home Reason: Reshot per request here. This is the first time I've nominated a picture when another has been chosen as VIAlbertson Home -- Galveston.jpg -- Jim Evans (talk)  Comment Technically you're supposed to do a Most Valued Review, but it's really confusing and I've never attempted it before. I've always thought that we should try to find a more efficient alternative to MVR. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 04:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)  Comment I'm undecided on which photo is more valuable, but in terms of how else we could handle these situations, we could adopt the delist-and-replace procedure that's used at COM:FPC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Scores: Albertson Home (Galveston).jpg: 0 Albertson Home -- Galveston.jpg: 0 Albertson Home (Galveston).jpg: undecided Albertson Home -- Galveston.jpg: undecided --Jim Evans (talk) 14:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Stringfellow Orchards

McKinney-McDonald House

View opposition Nominated by: Jim Evans (talk) on 2021-01-22 01:18 (UTC) Scope: {| cellspacing="8" cellpadding="0" style="width:100%; clear:both; margin:0.5em auto; background-color:#fdf4d8; border:2px solid #DAA520" This image is a former valued image on Wikimedia Commons within the scope: McKinney-McDonald House. You can see the original nomination and demotion [[Commons:Valued image candidates/<subpage>|here]].
Support Useful and a very pretty house. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)  Comment They completed the restoration and I'm hoping to get a new picture next time I'm in Galveston. -- Jim Evans (talk) 01:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)  Comment In that case, perhaps the scope should be modified to indicate that this picture shows the house before the restoration. When you get a new picture we can promote that to VI as well. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 17:29, 23 January 2021 (UTC)  Comment Yes, I agree, if there's a recognizable difference to the exterior. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:04, 23 January 2021 (UTC)  Done @Ikan Kekek: Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. ArchaeodontosMcKinney-McDonald Houseaurus (talk) 06:12, 26 January 2021 (UTC)  Oppose in favor of the other photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Scores: McKinney-McDonald House.jpg: +1 McKinney-McDonald House, Galveston.jpg: -1 => File:McKinney-McDonald House.jpg: Promoted File:McKinney-McDonald House, Galveston.jpg: Declined. --Jim Evans (talk) 20:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

|

View promotion

Nominated by: Jim Evans (talk) on 2021-02-01 16:24 (UTC)

Scope: McKinney-McDonald House with restoration continuing 10 years later

Reason: This picture and a couple more coming up were taken per request here. -- Jim Evans (talk)

Comment If you judge that this image is more relevant than the one that is already promoted in VI, you must go to Pending Most valued review candidates --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)  Question I remembered in the past if the Scope had a different name it didn't require MVR? -- Jim Evans (talk) 11:42, 2 February 2021 (UTC)  Comment This is not a problem of scope but a problem of substance. We are not going to make an appointment for each month of work.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)  Comment But in this case it's 10 years of work... —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 20:45, 2 February 2021 (UTC)  Comment @Kestreltail: @Ikan Kekek: Apparently I can't vote so will someone choose the best of these. (namely, this one) -- Jim Evans (talk) 13:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC)  Support Yes, I agree that this one is better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Scores: McKinney-McDonald House.jpg: +1 McKinney-McDonald House, Galveston.jpg: -1 => File:McKinney-McDonald House.jpg: Promoted File:McKinney-McDonald House, Galveston.jpg: Declined. --Jim Evans (talk) 20:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

| |}

Albertson Home

View Nominated by: Jim Evans (talk) on 2021-01-03 19:01 (UTC) Scope: Albertson Home  Support Only in scope, so best. Is this the best possible angle for a photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:53, 4 January 2021 (UTC)  Comment Probably should have shot this on head-on. As I remember, trees prevent shooting from the right. -- Jim Evans (talk) 11:37, 4 January 2021 (UTC)  Comment If you have a chance to get a more complete picture of the house, do an MVP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)  Comment I took and posted the new picture as requested but I still prefer this one. -- Jim Evans (talk) 8:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC) Scores: Albertson Home (Galveston).jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- Albertson Home -- Galveston.jpg: 0 Albertson Home (Galveston).jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- --Jim Evans (talk) 14:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View Nominated by: Jim Evans (talk) on 2021-02-01 17:07 (UTC) Scope: Albertson Home Reason: Reshot per request here. This is the first time I've nominated a picture when another has been chosen as VIAlbertson Home -- Galveston.jpg -- Jim Evans (talk)  Comment Technically you're supposed to do a Most Valued Review, but it's really confusing and I've never attempted it before. I've always thought that we should try to find a more efficient alternative to MVR. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 04:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)  Comment I'm undecided on which photo is more valuable, but in terms of how else we could handle these situations, we could adopt the delist-and-replace procedure that's used at COM:FPC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Scores: Albertson Home (Galveston).jpg: 0 Albertson Home -- Galveston.jpg: 0 Albertson Home (Galveston).jpg: undecided Albertson Home -- Galveston.jpg: undecided --Jim Evans (talk) 14:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Stringfellow Orchards

View opposition Nominated by: Jim Evans (talk) on 2021-01-25 23:41 (UTC) Scope: {| cellspacing="8" cellpadding="0" style="width:100%; clear:both; margin:0.5em auto; background-color:#fdf4d8; border:2px solid #DAA520" This image is a former valued image on Wikimedia Commons within the scope: Stringfellow Orchards. You can see the original nomination and demotion [[Commons:Valued image candidates/<subpage>|here]].
Support What's the event going on? There's a lot of people in the picture. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 05:13, 26 January 2021 (UTC)  Support per above. If you happen to go back when there are no or fewer people in front of the house, do a MVR. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:23, 26 January 2021 (UTC)  Comment . . Percival -- Samuel Collins III, a black gentleman from the area, restored this Confederate veteran's home. As I recall, this was the dedication ceremony. I think there's an annual Juneteenth celebration here now. -- Jim Evans (talk) 10:58, 26 January 2021 (UTC) Thanks for the info. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:38, 27 January 2021 (UTC) Result: 2 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 30 January 2021 (UTC)  Oppose in favor of the other photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:37, 4 February 2021 (UTC) Scores: Stringfellow Orchards 2.jpg: +2 Stringfellow Orchards.jpg: -1 => File:Stringfellow Orchards 2.jpg:Promoted File:Stringfellow Orchards.jpg: Declined. --Jim Evans (talk) 17:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

|

View promotion

Nominated by: Jim Evans (talk) on 2021-02-02 02:52 (UTC)

Scope: Stringfellow Orchards

Reason: Reshot per VI request -- Jim Evans (talk)

Support Much less cluttered. Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)  Support Super! Much better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC) Scores: Stringfellow Orchards 2.jpg: +2 Stringfellow Orchards.jpg: -1 => File:Stringfellow Orchards 2.jpg:Promoted File:Stringfellow Orchards.jpg: Declined. --Jim Evans (talk) 17:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

| |}