Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2017/11

Church of Saint Martin in Żelazno, exposure from E

View opposition Nominated by: Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-03-08 14:04 (UTC) Scope: Church of Saint Martin in Żelazno, exposure from E  Support Good choice. Yann (talk) 20:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 13 March 2015 (UTC) Scores: 1. 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina 04.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. 2017 Kościół św. Marcina w Żelaźnie 1.jpg: +2 => File:2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina 04.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:2017 Kościół św. Marcina w Żelaźnie 1.jpg: Promoted. ---- DeFacto (talk). 20:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-10-24 20:50 (UTC) Scope: Church of Saint Martin in Żelazno, exposure from E Reason: Better light -- Jacek Halicki (talk)  Comment There is already a VI with exaxt the same scope (see File:2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina 04.JPG) and one with a very similar scope (see File:2014 Żelazno, kościół św. Marcina o zmierzchu.jpg). You must open a Most Valued Review. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 21:54, 24 October 2017 (UTC)  Support, better light so now best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 07:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)  Support I think so --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 2 November 2017 (UTC) Scores: 1. 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina 04.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) 2. 2017 Kościół św. Marcina w Żelaźnie 1.jpg: +2 <-- => File:2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina 04.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. File:2017 Kościół św. Marcina w Żelaźnie 1.jpg: Promoted. <-- ---- DeFacto (talk). 20:43, 5 November 2017 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Hardinge Bridge, inside view

View opposition Nominated by: ~Moheen (keep talking) on 2017-11-03 19:37 (UTC) Scope: Hardinge Bridge, inside view Used in: See Global usage  Oppose in favor of the other one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:06, 6 November 2017 (UTC) Scores: 1. Hardinge Bridge 02.jpg: -1 <-- 2. Hardinge Bridge 03.jpg: +2 => File:Hardinge Bridge 02.jpg: Declined. <-- File:Hardinge Bridge 03.jpg: Promoted. ---- DeFacto (talk). 18:28, 9 November 2017 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Masum-al-Hasan (talk) on 2017-10-31 09:24 (UTC) Scope: Hardinge Bridge, inside view  Comment It would be useful to add "inside view" in scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 1 November 2017 (UTC)  Comment I prefer this File:Hardinge Bridge 02.jpg. Also, scope should be change. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC) Scope changed from Hardinge Bridge to Hardinge Bridge, inside view --~Moheen (keep talking) 19:49, 3 November 2017 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". @Archaeodontosaurus: : See MVR candidate. ~Moheen (keep talking) 19:49, 3 November 2017 (UTC)  Support This image is much more valuable because it allows to understand the metal structure of the bridge. The object is well described. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)  Support - The other one is a better composition, but in terms of usability in the scope, I agree with Archaeodontosaurus' argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:07, 6 November 2017 (UTC) Scores: 1. Hardinge Bridge 02.jpg: -1 2. Hardinge Bridge 03.jpg: +2 <-- => File:Hardinge Bridge 02.jpg: Declined. File:Hardinge Bridge 03.jpg: Promoted. <-- ---- DeFacto (talk). 18:28, 9 November 2017 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)