Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2013/12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Iyasu's Palace, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior)

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2013-10-25 17:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Iyasu's Palace, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior)

 Comment I think that File:Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg is a better candidate. Better perspective, colors and light. Halavar (talk) 23:34, 25 October 2013 (UTC) Scores:[reply]

1. Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: -1
2. Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: +1

=>

File:Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: Declined.
File:Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: Promoted.
--Godot13 (talk) 04:55, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2013-10-26 18:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Iyasu's Palace, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior)

 Support Best in scope in my opinion. Halavar (talk) 17:07, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Scores:[reply]

1. Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: -1
2. Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: +1

=>

File:Iyasu's Palace 01.jpg: Declined.
File:Iyasu's Palace 02.jpg: Promoted.
--Godot13 (talk) 04:56, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2013-10-26 18:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Chancellery of Yohannes I, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior)

 Comment I think you've got better candidates: Chancellery of Yohannes I 01.jpg or Chancellery of Yohannes I 02.jpg Better light, colors, angle and sky. Halavar (talk) 18:43, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. Chancellery of Yohannes I 03.jpg: -1
2. Chancellery of Yohannes I 02.jpg: -1
3. Chancellery of Yohannes I 01.jpg: +2 
=>
File:Chancellery of Yohannes I 03.jpg: Declined.
File:Chancellery of Yohannes I 02.jpg: Declined.
File:Chancellery of Yohannes I 01.jpg: Promoted.
--Halavar (talk) 15:34, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2013-10-27 00:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Chancellery of Yohannes I, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior)

Scores:

1. Chancellery of Yohannes I 03.jpg: -1
2. Chancellery of Yohannes I 02.jpg: -1
3. Chancellery of Yohannes I 01.jpg: +2 
=>
File:Chancellery of Yohannes I 03.jpg: Declined.
File:Chancellery of Yohannes I 02.jpg: Declined.
File:Chancellery of Yohannes I 01.jpg: Promoted.
--Halavar (talk) 15:35, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2013-10-27 00:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Chancellery of Yohannes I, Gondar, Ethiopia (exterior)

 Support Best in scope in my opinion. Halavar (talk) 17:06, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. Chancellery of Yohannes I 03.jpg: -1
2. Chancellery of Yohannes I 02.jpg: -1
3. Chancellery of Yohannes I 01.jpg: +2 
=>
File:Chancellery of Yohannes I 03.jpg: Declined.
File:Chancellery of Yohannes I 02.jpg: Declined.
File:Chancellery of Yohannes I 01.jpg: Promoted.
--Halavar (talk) 15:35, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Al-Aqsa Mosque, NE exposure.

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Berthold Werner (talk) on 2012-01-09 18:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Al-Aqsa Mosque (exterior)
Reason:
The Al-Aqsa Mosque is one of the most important mosques of the muslims and often called the third holiest mosque. --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC) -- Berthold Werner (talk)[reply]

Good but, I think you forget the geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:10, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 21:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
[reply]
Scores: 
1. Israel-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Al-Aqsa Mosque (NE exposure).jpg: +2
2. Jerusalem Al-Aqsa Mosque BW 2010-09-21 06-38-12.JPG: -1 (current VI within same scope) <--
=>
File:Israel-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Al-Aqsa Mosque (NE exposure).jpg: Promoted.
File:Jerusalem Al-Aqsa Mosque BW 2010-09-21 06-38-12.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
--Halavar (talk) 15:48, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Godot13 (talk) on 2013-11-18 02:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Al-Aqsa Mosque, NE exposure.
Used in:
Al-Aqsa Mosque, Jerusalem in Islam, Holy Land, History of the Knights Templar, and Isra and Mi'raj
Reason:
Northeast exposure of Al-Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount, in the Old City of Jerusalem. Considered to be the third holiest site in Islam after al-Haram in Mecca and an-Nabawi in Medina. -- Godot13 (talk)

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. Israel-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Al-Aqsa Mosque (NE exposure).jpg: +2
2. Jerusalem Al-Aqsa Mosque BW 2010-09-21 06-38-12.JPG: -1 (current VI within same scope) <--
=>
File:Israel-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Al-Aqsa Mosque (NE exposure).jpg: Promoted.
File:Jerusalem Al-Aqsa Mosque BW 2010-09-21 06-38-12.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
--Halavar (talk) 15:47, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Tuxyso (talk) on 2013-12-18 09:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Manuela Schwesig
Reason:
There is already a VI for the same scope (also by Jean11), but imho this one is better: 1. better facial expression (smiling) 2. better posture of the head (straight and not leaning) 3. better light - at the other one the right side of the background is brigther than the other side 4. less strong shadows at the neck -- Tuxyso (talk)
Scores: 
1. Manuela Schwesig 2.jpg: +2
2. Manuela Schwesig.jpg: -1 (current VI within same scope) <--
=>
File:Manuela Schwesig 2.jpg: Promoted.
File:Manuela Schwesig.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
--Halavar (talk) 23:32, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Jean11 (talk) on 2013-09-14 11:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Manuela_Schwesig
Used in:
de:Manuela_Schwesig, fr:Manuela_Schwesig, ja:マヌエラ・シュヴェーズィヒ

 Comment : I think she's a politician but it would be nice to add it in the caption and to add a translation of this caption in English. --JLPC (talk) 15:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC)*✓ Done--Jean11 (talk) 17:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry, but when I wrote "the caption", I meant the caption of your file (File:Manuela Schwesig.jpg), not about the scope, which was OK. I think it's easy to fix. Sorry for my English. --JLPC (talk) 20:15, 14 September 2013 (UTC) I had done both. --Jean11 (talk) 08:56, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've seen it but a scope isn't a caption and your scope is too long, which is a pity because the picture is OK, of course. I don't want to be pricky, I just want you to apply to your picture the rules all users apply to theirs. I hope you'll understand. Regards. --JLPC (talk) 17:18, 15 September 2013 (UTC) I had done it because of YOUR "but it would be nice to add it in the caption". At the file page it says "description". Now it´s time for your vote. --Jean11 (talk) 17:47, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose To me, the more smiling portrait is better--Jebulon (talk) 19:36, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment On my photo, she smiles deeper. Sculpt your mouth like them and you can feel it. And her face tell there much more. And in "your" picture she looks to the right. But the Wikipedia texts are left. --Jean11 (talk) 18:16, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • Sorry, Jean11, I've not used orders like the one in your last sentence, or capital letters as you did previously. I've tried my best to help you because some users did the same for me a few months ago. I've already apologized for my English but every one on this page knows what "caption" means and if it doesn't mean "description" it doesn't mean "scope" either. Now I think, in these circumstances, a longer discussion would be a loss of time. So, I let more experimented reviewers vote or not for your picture. Regards. --JLPC (talk) 21:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC) I´ve not used orders too. It was a reference only. en:Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith. I dont´t have the right to change filename, like many other. So, I thought you meant one of the other two. The "YOUR" was a reference too. See en:Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith too. --Jean11 (talk) 18:16, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        • I think I have to apologize again : according to the Valued image criteria, "English description is preferred although not essential. "... But there's another criteria : "There should be a full and informative description of what the image depicts" , which wasn't satisfied the first time you nominated this picture. Regards. --JLPC (talk) 11:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC) There was a link to the de, en, fr, ja, no and pt Wikipedia article. According your "it would be nice" I had the description of the 6 languages ​​addition of a sentence. Now all ok? Peace? I give you my hand. Greetz --Jean11 (talk) 18:16, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I would have preferred, as Jebulon, the smile of another image. But the caption is excellent. Must prefer the caption done well, rather than a smile. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:06, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Je sais bien, c'est même moi qui en ai corrigé la version française, de la légende !!! Clin Avant que j'intervienne, elle était "homme politique allemande"... Or y'a pas à dire, c'est une femme, et bien jolie !--Jebulon (talk) 16:28, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:58, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
[reply]
Scores: 
1. Manuela Schwesig 2.jpg: +2
2. Manuela Schwesig.jpg: -1 (current VI within same scope) <--
=>
File:Manuela Schwesig 2.jpg: Promoted.
File:Manuela Schwesig.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
--Halavar (talk) 23:33, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)