Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2013/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Closed most valued reviews 2013/03

   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) on 2013-02-06 18:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Lubča Castle

Scores:

1. Любча2.jpg: 0 <--
2. Lubcza.jpg: +1 
=>
File:Любча2.jpg: Declined. <--
File:Lubcza.jpg: Promoted. 
--Myrabella (talk) 20:42, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Ikar.us (talk) on 2013-02-07 17:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Lubča Castle, Belarus
Used in:
ru:Любчанский замок, be:Любчанскі замак, en:Lubcha
Reason:
All buildings. And better light. -- Ikar.us (talk)
Scores: 
1. Любча2.jpg: 0 
2. Lubcza.jpg: +1 <--
=>
File:Любча2.jpg: Declined. 
File:Lubcza.jpg: Promoted. <--
--Myrabella (talk) 20:42, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Velvet (talk) on 2013-02-12 21:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Chamber of Commerce of Lille (exterior)

Thought this was an institution, but fr: says it's the building. Support the scope, but not the image. MVR. --Ikar.us (talk) 01:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. Lille CCI 2.jpg: +3 <--
2. Lille CCI.jpg: 0
=>
File:Lille CCI 2.jpg: Promoted. <--
File:Lille CCI.jpg: Declined.
--Myrabella (talk) 20:46, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Ikar.us (talk) on 2013-02-13 01:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Chamber of Commerce of Lille, France (exterior)
Reason:
Fewer obstacles. Well placed, for full view of portal. -- Ikar.us (talk)

Scores:

1. Lille CCI 2.jpg: +3 
2. Lille CCI.jpg: 0 <--
=>
File:Lille CCI 2.jpg: Promoted. 
File:Lille CCI.jpg: Declined. <--
--Myrabella (talk) 20:46, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Helix pomatia (Burgundy snail)

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2009-01-28 13:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Helix pomatia (Burgundy snail)
Scores: 
1. Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg: 0
3. Grapevinesnail 01.jpg: +1  <--
=>
File:Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg: Declined.
File:Grapevinesnail 01.jpg: Promoted. <--
--Eusebius (talk) 21:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Grapevinesnail 01.jpg: -2 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Helix pomatia 002.JPG: +1 
3. Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg: 0 
=>
File:Grapevinesnail 01.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Helix pomatia 002.JPG: Promoted.
File:Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg: Declined.
--Myrabella (talk) 00:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2013-03-08 07:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Helix pomatia (Burgundy snail)

 Support Good quality photographic animal is shown in its environment. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:34, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. Grapevinesnail 01.jpg: -2 (current VI within same scope)
2. Helix pomatia 002.JPG: +1  <--
3. Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg: 0 
=>
File:Grapevinesnail 01.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
File:Helix pomatia 002.JPG: Promoted.  <--
File:Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg: Declined.
--Myrabella (talk) 00:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
 B.p. on 12:28, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Helix pomatia (Burgundy snail)
Used in:
da:Vinbjergsnegl, fr:Helix pomatia, nl:Wijngaardslak
Scores: 
1. Grapevinesnail 01.jpg: -2 (current VI within same scope) 
2. Helix pomatia 002.JPG: +1 
3. Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg: 0  <--
=>
File:Grapevinesnail 01.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
File:Helix pomatia 002.JPG: Promoted.
File:Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg: Declined.  <--
--Myrabella (talk) 00:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Equus ferus caballus, American Saddlebred

[edit]
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pitke (talk) on 2013-03-12 12:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Equus ferus caballus, American Saddlebred
Reason:
Typical for breed, high quality animal, five-gaited, i.e. has both breed specific gaits, in a correct conformational shot from the side, with correct tack, turnout, and pose for showing for the breed. Geocoded. -- Pitke (talk)

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:56, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. "Breaking News" during the Five Gaited Stake class (3008085680).jpg: +1 <--
3. American Saddlebred Shelbyville CF 212.jpg: 0 
=>
File:"Breaking News" during the Five Gaited Stake class (3008085680).jpg: Promoted. <--
File:American Saddlebred Shelbyville CF 212.jpg: Declined.
--Myrabella (talk) 00:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Pitke (talk) on 2013-03-12 12:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Equus ferus caballus, American Saddlebred
Used in:
nl:American Saddlebred
Reason:
Typical for breed, high quality animal, five-gaited, i.e. has both breed specific gaits, in a clear shot from the side, with correct tack and turnout for showing for the breed. Performing an ambling gait specific for the breed and an important aspect of the breed. Geocoded. -- Pitke (talk)

 Comment the animal on the horse's back looks a bit ridiculous. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:58, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That my friend is the height of style for Saddle seat riding. --Pitke (talk) 14:52, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, I'm ignorant. Thank you for the link. It is not alone ... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:11, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. "Breaking News" during the Five Gaited Stake class (3008085680).jpg: +1
3. American Saddlebred Shelbyville CF 212.jpg: 0 <--
=>
File:"Breaking News" during the Five Gaited Stake class (3008085680).jpg: Promoted.
File:American Saddlebred Shelbyville CF 212.jpg: Declined. <--
--Myrabella (talk) 00:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)


   

View opposition
Nominated by:
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} on 2013-03-11 03:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Amruteshwar temple, exterior
Reason:
Best one that gives full view. -- §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C}

 Support All criteria met--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Arch, do you think i should withdraw this nomination? I think i found another better one. File:Amriteshwar temple.jpg. It is placed in a wrong category and hence couldn't find it when i nominated this one. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 19:35, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that the author is not a member of COMMONS. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Amruteshwar Temple.JPG: 0 <--
2. Amriteshwar temple.jpg: 2
=>
File:Amruteshwar Temple.JPG: Declined. <--
File:Amriteshwar temple.jpg: Promoted.
--Myrabella (talk) 00:42, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Myrabella (talk) on 2013-03-12 22:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Amruteshwar temple, exterior
Reason:
As per User:Dharmadhyaksha's suggestion. -- Myrabella (talk)
Scores: 
1. Amruteshwar Temple.JPG: 0 
2. Amriteshwar temple.jpg: 2 <--
=>
File:Amruteshwar Temple.JPG: Declined.
File:Amriteshwar temple.jpg: Promoted. <--
--Myrabella (talk) 00:42, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)