Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2010/11

Closed most valued reviews/2010/11

View opposition
Nominated by: elemaki (talk) on 15 jul 2008
Scope: Almería
Comment Please link your scope per guidelines (I've done it for you here). Lycaon (talk) 06:10, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Panorámica de Almería.jpg: +0 2. 2007-12-18-04706 Spain Almeria.jpg: +2 3. Almería aire.JPG: +0 => File:Panorámica de Almería.jpg: Declined. File:2007-12-18-04706 Spain Almeria.jpg: Promoted. File:Almería aire.JPG: Declined. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:45, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff (talk) on 2010-10-21 05:59 (UTC)
Scope: Almería
Request At the review size, maybe my favorite, but not geocoded. Could you please add a getag? --Myrabella (talk) 20:50, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply] Done geotaged, also and the other candidate.--MrPanyGoff (talk) 09:56, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply] Support Better rendering at the review size, showing the location along the sea + the hill with the Alcazaba in a clearer way IMO. --Myrabella (talk) 12:16, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply] Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:11, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Panorámica de Almería.jpg: +0 2. 2007-12-18-04706 Spain Almeria.jpg: +2 3. Almería aire.JPG: +0 => File:Panorámica de Almería.jpg: Declined. File:2007-12-18-04706 Spain Almeria.jpg: Promoted. File:Almería aire.JPG: Declined. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: MrPanyGoff (talk) on 2010-10-21 06:07 (UTC)
Scope: Almería
Scores: 1. Panorámica de Almería.jpg: +0 2. 2007-12-18-04706 Spain Almeria.jpg: +2 3. Almería aire.JPG: +0 => File:Panorámica de Almería.jpg: Declined. File:2007-12-18-04706 Spain Almeria.jpg: Promoted. File:Almería aire.JPG: Declined. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:47, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: The High Fin Sperm Whale on 2010-10-22 18:03 (UTC)
Scope: Hypholoma fasciculare (sulphur tuft)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:32, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Hypholoma fasciculare 5.JPG: +0 2. Hypholoma fasciculare LC0091.jpg: +1 => File:Hypholoma fasciculare 5.JPG: Declined. File:Hypholoma fasciculare LC0091.jpg: Promoted. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:38, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: The High Fin Sperm Whale on 2010-11-12 22:12 (UTC)
Scope: Taricha granulosa (Rough-skinned newt)
Reason: I'm not sure whether this or the other are better, so I opened a MVR. -- The High Fin Sperm Whale
Scores: 1. Rough-skinned newt (Taricha granulosa).JPG: +0 2. Taricha granulosa (Rough-skinned newt).JPG: +3 => File:Rough-skinned newt (Taricha granulosa).JPG: Declined. File:Taricha granulosa (Rough-skinned newt).JPG: Promoted. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:52, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: The High Fin Sperm Whale on 2010-11-12 22:12 (UTC)
Scope: Taricha granulosa (Rough-skinned newt)
Reason: I'm not sure whether this or the other are better, so I opened a MVR. -- The High Fin Sperm Whale
Support Both are good but we must choose one. This for me ! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply] Support I think this one illustrates "[w]hen viewed from above, the eyes of T. granulosa do not protrude beyond the profile of the head."[1] This distinguishes it from Taricha torosa. Walter Siegmund (talk) 22:51, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply] Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:17, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Rough-skinned newt (Taricha granulosa).JPG: +0 2. Taricha granulosa (Rough-skinned newt).JPG: +3 => File:Rough-skinned newt (Taricha granulosa).JPG: Declined. File:Taricha granulosa (Rough-skinned newt).JPG: Promoted. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:53, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Navigation menu