Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2009/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
   

View
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2009-03-23 13:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Aqueduto dos Pegões
Used in:
Aqueduct, Aqueduto dos Pegões, fr:Aqueduc des Pegões, ja:トマール, pt:Aqueduto

 Comment Perspective is good but lacking details --Richard Bartz (talk) 12:49, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Support I slightly prefer this one, because I can see the shape of the trench(?) on this one although the image quality of the alternative is better. --Slaunger (talk) 21:09, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose This comparison is tough. I slightly prefer the other version, because finer structural conditions are hardly visible on this one. I'am afraid but quality is very important here - a contradiction to criteria 1 but more quality would fulfil criterion 3. Honestly said both pictures are not perfect because the canal should be connected with the junction on a figurative base. This is a case where the picture should be self explaining. The foreground isn't so important --Richard Bartz (talk) 20:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Aqueduto dos pegoes.jpg: 0
3. Tomar December 2008-4.jpg (2): 0
=>
File:Aqueduto dos pegoes.jpg: Undecided.
File:Tomar December 2008-4.jpg: Undecided.
--Eusebius (talk) 13:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2009-03-23 13:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Aqueduto dos Pegões
Used in:
Aqueduto dos Pegões, en:Aqueduct, pt:Aqueduto dos Pegões

 Comment This image looks tilted somehow but has better details and lighting. --Richard Bartz (talk) 12:48, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. Aqueduto dos pegoes.jpg: 0
3. Tomar December 2008-4.jpg (2): 0
=>
File:Aqueduto dos pegoes.jpg: Undecided.
File:Tomar December 2008-4.jpg: Undecided.
--Eusebius (talk) 13:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Lotus cytisoides (Grey Bird's-Foot Trefoil)

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Lycaon (talk) on 2009-03-17 09:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Lotus cytisoides (Grey Bird's-Foot Trefoil)
Used in:
ca:Llista de plantes de Catalunya, es:Parque Natural del Delta del Ebro

Scope changed from Lotus cytisoides (Grey Bird's-Foot Trefoil), flowers to Lotus cytisoides (Grey Bird's-Foot Trefoil) Lycaon (talk) 10:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

Scores: 
1. Lotus cytisoides.jpg: 0
3. Lotus cytisoides (habitus).jpg: +1 
=>
File:Lotus cytisoides.jpg: Declined.
File:Lotus cytisoides (habitus).jpg: Promoted.
--Eusebius (talk) 13:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Slaunger (talk) on 2009-03-23 21:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Lotus cytisoides (Grey Bird's-Foot Trefoil)
Scores: 
1. Lotus cytisoides.jpg: 0
3. Lotus cytisoides (habitus).jpg: +1 
=>
File:Lotus cytisoides.jpg: Declined.
File:Lotus cytisoides (habitus).jpg: Promoted.
--Eusebius (talk) 13:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
   

View
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2009-03-26 22:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Allianz Arena

Scores:

1. Allianz arena daylight Richard Bartz.jpg: 0
3. Allianz-Arena-München.jpg: 0
=>
File:Allianz arena daylight Richard Bartz.jpg: Undecided
File:Allianz-Arena-München.jpg: Undecided
--Eusebius (talk) 13:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2009-03-26 22:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Allianz Arena

Scores:

1. Allianz arena daylight Richard Bartz.jpg: 0
3. Allianz-Arena-München.jpg: 0
=>
File:Allianz arena daylight Richard Bartz.jpg: Undecided
File:Allianz-Arena-München.jpg: Undecided
--Eusebius (talk) 13:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Xerus inauris (Cape Ground Squirrel)

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Lycaon (talk) on 2009-03-29 19:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Xerus inauris (Cape Ground Squirrel)
Used in:
fr:Xerus inauris, nl:Kaapse grondeekhoorn, species:Sciuromorpha, species:Xerus inauris
Reason:
High resolution image showing animals with typical vigilant behaviour in their natural environment -- Lycaon (talk)
Scores: 
1. Xerus inauris 1.jpg: 0
2. Xerus inauris.jpg: +1 
=>
File:Xerus inauris 1.jpg: Declined
File:Xerus inauris.jpg: Promoteded.
--Eusebius (talk) 11:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Slaunger (talk) on 2009-04-02 21:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Xerus inauris (Cape Ground Squirrel)
Reason:
Better for illustrating the species than File:Xerus inauris 1.jpg because the entire animal is better seen, and the composition is less confusing in review size. I can also see this image is used as the taxobox image on the Wikipedias I checked, and I tend to agree with that choise. -- Slaunger (talk)
  •  Support Agree with Slaunger's comments above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yann (talk • contribs) 2009-04-07 21:06 (UTC) (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Xerus inauris 1.jpg: 0
2. Xerus inauris.jpg: +1 
=>
File:Xerus inauris 1.jpg: Declined
File:Xerus inauris.jpg: Promoteded.
--Eusebius (talk) 11:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Großhesseloher Brücke

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Richard Bartz (talk) on 2009-03-28 22:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Großhesseloher Brücke
Used in:
de:Großhesseloher Brücke
Well, pedantism ? I'am in I think we should raise the value of the picture a bit more, how ? I found out that 2 different trainlines crossing the bridge, so I went to this place in the morning and waited for them. Should I withdraw in favour to the new picture ? --Richard Bartz (talk) 15:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


More quality, bigger size & all possibilities (trains, pedestrians, bikers and the little diner which sells Weißwurst and Wiener on the very left side)

  •  Comment I like that attitudelol! Well the most natural thing would be for you, the nominator and creator of both images to open an MVR where the two images compete. --Slaunger (talk) 21:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, done --Richard Bartz (talk) 21:47, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Grosshesseloher Brücke R B.jpg: 0
2. Grosshesseloher Bruecke.jpg: +2
=>
File:Grosshesseloher Brücke R B.jpg: Declined.
File:Grosshesseloher Bruecke.jpg: Promoted.
--Eusebius (talk) 11:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Richard Bartz (talk) on 2009-04-03 00:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Grosshesseloher Bruecke
Used in:
de:Großhesseloher Brücke
Reason:
More quality, bigger size & all possibilities (trains, pedestrians, bikers and the little diner which sells Weißwurst and Wiener on the very left side) -- Richard Bartz (talk)

 Support Meets all criteria and slightly better than its MVR competitor. --Slaunger (talk) 11:16, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. Grosshesseloher Brücke R B.jpg: 0
2. Grosshesseloher Bruecke.jpg: +2
=>
File:Grosshesseloher Brücke R B.jpg: Declined.
File:Grosshesseloher Bruecke.jpg: Promoted.
--Eusebius (talk) 11:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
   

View
Nominated by:
ComputerHotline (talk) on 2009-04-06 10:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Fort du Salbert

Scope changed from Main entry of the fortifications of the Salbert hill (HDR) to Fort du Salbert --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:01, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

There is currently nothing in the criteria about the title of a picture. --Eusebius (talk) 06:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. ComputerHotline - entree (by).jpg: -1
2. Thomas Bresson - Entree-fort-1 (by).jpg: -1 
=>
File:ComputerHotline - entree (by).jpg: Undecided.
File:Thomas Bresson - Entree-fort-1 (by).jpg: Undecided.
--Eusebius (talk) 06:07, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2009-04-07 13:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Fort du Salbert

 Oppose Should be properly renamed before. A crop of the ground would improve it. Yann (talk) 14:11, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently nothing in the criteria about the title of a picture. --Eusebius (talk) 06:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Per Yann about the image name --Richard Bartz (talk) 10:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. ComputerHotline - entree (by).jpg: -1
2. Thomas Bresson - Entree-fort-1 (by).jpg: -1 
=>
File:ComputerHotline - entree (by).jpg: Undecided.
File:Thomas Bresson - Entree-fort-1 (by).jpg: Undecided.
--Eusebius (talk) 06:07, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Bridge 25 de Abril, Lisbon

[edit]
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alvesgaspar (talk) on 2009-04-09 09:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Bridge 25 de Abril over the Tagus, Lisbon
Used in:
Ponte 25 de Abril

 Comment - Aesthetically, I very much prefer this one. But am not sure about the value -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:08, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. Ponte25Abril1.jpg: +2
2. Bridge Tagus April 2009-1a.jpg: 0
=>
File:Ponte25Abril1.jpg: Promoted.
File:Bridge Tagus April 2009-1a.jpg: Declined.
--Eusebius (talk) 06:09, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Alvesgaspar (talk) on 2009-04-09 09:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Bridge 25 de Abril over the Tagus, Lisbon
Used in:
Ponte 25 de Abril

 Comment - Aesthetically, I very much prefer the first one. But am not sure about the value -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. Ponte25Abril1.jpg: +2
2. Bridge Tagus April 2009-1a.jpg: 0
=>
File:Ponte25Abril1.jpg: Promoted.
File:Bridge Tagus April 2009-1a.jpg: Declined.
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Dartington Hall

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Mbz1 (talk) on 2009-04-10 15:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Dartington Hall
Used in:
en:Dartington Hall

Thank you for the review and for the comment. May I please ask you, if you prefer crop or original or nominating the one that you suggested? Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:17, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An MVR can be set up if it is needed, but:
  • Between this one and the crop, I'd favour a crop (subject is too tiny here);
  • Between this one (cropped) and the other, I don't know: which side is more relevant, and why? --Eusebius (talk) 14:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you. I took another look and I believe now that the one you suggested is better because in the nominated image part of the building is behind the trees. May I please ask you how I should proceed, just to change the image in this existing nomination or create a new one (Sorry, I probably should have known this myself, but I do not)? --Mbz1 (talk) 14:32, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I suggest you put all the images in competition in a most valuable review (MVR). Nominate them all (invididually), give them a "discussed" status, add an entry in this page (there is an example in the source code) and remove this entry from the main list. --Eusebius (talk) 14:38, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Dartington hall.jpg: 0
2. Main Hall entrance Dartington.jpg: +1 
=>
File:Dartington hall.jpg: Declined.
File:Main Hall entrance Dartington.jpg: Promoted.
--Eusebius (talk) 06:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Mbz1 (talk) on 2009-04-10 15:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Dartington Hall
Scores: 
1. Dartington hall.jpg: 0
2. Main Hall entrance Dartington.jpg: +1 
=>
File:Dartington hall.jpg: Declined.
File:Main Hall entrance Dartington.jpg: Promoted.
--Eusebius (talk) 06:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2009-04-09 12:35 (UTC)
Scope:
World Health Organisation building, Geneva.
Used in:
en:World Health Organisation, fr:Organisation mondiale de la santé, de:Weltgesundheitsorganisation, es:Organización Mundial de la Salud, eo:Monda Organizaĵo pri Sano, ca:Organització Mundial de la Salut, it:Organizzazione mondiale della sanità

 Comment I hesitate which image to nominate. Please help with your comments. Yann (talk) 13:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. World Health Organisation building south face.jpg: 0
2. OMS.jpg: +1 
=>
File:World Health Organisation building south face.jpg: Declined.
File:OMS.jpg: Promoted.
--Eusebius (talk) 16:46, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Commons:Valued image candidates/World Health Organisation headquarters, Geneva, north and west sides.jpg
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Mbz1 (talk) on 2009-04-12 03:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Grimspound
Used in:
en:Grimspound
Reason:
IMO the best image in the category to illustrate the scope. -- Mbz1 (talk)
Thank you for your comment, Jolly Janner.--Mbz1 (talk) 16:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Grimspound circle 4.jpg: 0
2. Grimspound view 2.jpg: +1 
=>
File:Grimspound circle 4.jpg: Declined.
File:Grimspound view 2.jpg: Promoted.
--Eusebius (talk) 16:48, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Mbz1 (talk) on 2009-04-16 15:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Grimspound
Used in:
en:Grimspound

 Support As I already stated on the other image up for review, this image shows the whole of Grimspound. Jolly Janner (talk) 17:46, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. Grimspound circle 4.jpg: 0
2. Grimspound view 2.jpg: +1 
=>
File:Grimspound circle 4.jpg: Declined.
File:Grimspound view 2.jpg: Promoted.
--Eusebius (talk) 16:48, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Ruins of the castle in Szubin

[edit]
   

View
Nominated by:
Albertus teolog (talk) on 2009-04-20 10:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Ruins of the castle in Szubin
Used in:
pl:Pałuki

Scores:

1. Szubin.ruiny2.JPG: 0
2. Szubin.ruiny3.JPG: -1 
=>
File:Szubin.ruiny2.JPG: Undecided
File:Szubin.ruiny3.JPG: Undecided.
--Eusebius (talk) 11:57, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by:
Albertus teolog (talk) on 2009-04-19 14:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Ruins of the castle in Szubin
Used in:
pl:Szubin

Scope changed from Szubin Castle to Ruins of the castle in Szubin Albertus teolog (talk) 11:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

Scores: 
1. Szubin.ruiny2.JPG: 0
2. Szubin.ruiny3.JPG: -1 
=>
File:Szubin.ruiny2.JPG: Undecided
File:Szubin.ruiny3.JPG: Undecided.
--Eusebius (talk) 11:57, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alvesgaspar (talk) on 2009-04-20 07:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Tower of Belém
Used in:
Tower of Belém, Torre de Belém, Tour de Belém

 Support Excellent quality. Fit the scope. Yann (talk) 08:41, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. Torre Belém April 2009-4a.jpg: +1
2. Torre de Belém Lisboa Richard Bartz.jpg: 0 
=>
File:Torre Belém April 2009-4a.jpg: Promoted.
File:Torre de Belém Lisboa Richard Bartz.jpg: Declined.
--Eusebius (talk) 11:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2009-04-20 13:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Torre de Belém

Scores:

1. Torre Belém April 2009-4a.jpg: +1
2. Torre de Belém Lisboa Richard Bartz.jpg: 0 
=>
File:Torre Belém April 2009-4a.jpg: Promoted.
File:Torre de Belém Lisboa Richard Bartz.jpg: Declined.
--Eusebius (talk) 11:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)