Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2008/11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Doppler effect

[edit]
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pbroks13 (talk) on 2008-10-22 05:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Doppler effect
Used in:
en:Doppler effect
One source, no interference. Only crests and troughs of the same single wave. --Eusebius (talk) 10:55, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong, Doppler= relative speeds (2) - but I will not discuss that here. (speed on the left side = medium speed + object speed, on the right side = medium speed - object speed) --Foroa (talk) 12:21, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

* Oppose Comment Beautiful image and nice work, but I think this one is more self-explanatory. Setting up a MVR. --Eusebius (talk) 09:59, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done MVR available here. --Eusebius (talk) 10:04, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose None of them is good enough to honour the saying: "a picture is worth 1000 thousand word". In bothncases, we must know what Doppler effect is to understand the picture. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment the description on the image page is part of the value of a VI candidate. --Eusebius (talk) 19:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment It shows that with a moving object, the frequency of whatever the waves (sound, light, ect) are higher in front of the object and lower behind the object. Is the problem that it doesn't show clearly enough that it is a moving object? Pbroks13 (talk) 07:47, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Doppler effect.svg: +1 <--
2. Doppler effect diagrammatic.svg: 0
=>
Image:Doppler effect.svg: Promoted. <--
Image:Doppler effect diagrammatic.svg: Declined.
--Eusebius (talk) 16:33, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-10-22 10:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Doppler effect

 Oppose None of them is good enough to honour the saying: "a picture is worth 1000 thousand word". In bothncases, we must know what Doppler effect is to understand the picture. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment the description on the image page is part of the value of a VI candidate. --Eusebius (talk) 19:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Doppler effect.svg: +1
2. Doppler effect diagrammatic.svg: 0 <--
=>
Image:Doppler effect.svg: Promoted.
Image:Doppler effect diagrammatic.svg: Declined. <--
--Eusebius (talk) 16:33, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

École Militaire

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Albertus teolog (talk) on 2008-10-17 12:24 (UTC)
Scope:
École Militaire
Used in:
en:École Militaire

Scores: 

1. Paryż szkoła wojskowa.JPG: 0 <--
2. Paryż szkoła wojskowa2.JPG: +1
=>
Image:Paryż szkoła wojskowa.JPG: Declined. <--
Image:Paryż szkoła wojskowa2.JPG: Promoted.
--Eusebius (talk) 10:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Albertus teolog (talk) on 2008-10-17 12:28 (UTC)
Scope:
École Militaire
Used in:
fr:École militaire

 Support - this one --Pudelek (talk) 10:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply] 

Scores: 
1. Paryż szkoła wojskowa.JPG: 0
2. Paryż szkoła wojskowa2.JPG: +1 <--
=>
Image:Paryż szkoła wojskowa.JPG: Declined.
Image:Paryż szkoła wojskowa2.JPG: Promoted. <--
--Eusebius (talk) 10:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Cathédrale Saint-Pierre et Saint-Paul de Nantes (interior)

[edit]
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-10-29 08:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Cathédrale Saint-Pierre et Saint-Paul de Nantes (interior)

 Support Better light and perspective corrected. --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:11, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Support --Lestat (talk) 21:12, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Scores:[reply] 

1. Cathédrale de Nantes - nef.jpg: +2 <--
2. Cathédrale Nantes nef.JPG: -1
=>
Image:Cathédrale de Nantes - nef.jpg: Promoted. <--
Image:Cathédrale Nantes nef.JPG: Declined.
--Eusebius (talk) 10:33, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-10-29 08:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Cathédrale Saint-Pierre et Saint-Paul de Nantes (interior)		 
1. Cathédrale de Nantes - nef.jpg: +2
2. Cathédrale Nantes nef.JPG: -1 <--
=>
Image:Cathédrale de Nantes - nef.jpg: Promoted.
Image:Cathédrale Nantes nef.JPG: Declined. <--
--Eusebius (talk) 10:33, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Théâtre Graslin, Nantes

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-10-29 10:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Théâtre Graslin, Nantes

Scores: 

1. Theatre-gralin.jpg: 0 <--
2. Théâtre Graslin.jpg: +1
=>
Image:Theatre-gralin.jpg: Declined. <--
Image:Théâtre Graslin.jpg: Promoted.
--Eusebius (talk) 10:35, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
MrPanyGoff (talk) on 2012-07-10 06:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Théâtre Graslin, Nantes (exterior)

Previous reviews 

Scores: 
1. Théâtre Graslin (retouch).jpg: +1 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Théâtre Graslin - Place Graslin, Nantes.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Théâtre Graslin (retouch).jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Théâtre Graslin - Place Graslin, Nantes.jpg: Promoted.
--MrPanyGoff 16:35, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Amiens (interior)

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-10-29 14:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Amiens (interior)

Scores: 

1. Amiens cathédrale21.JPG: 0 <--
2. Cathedrale d'Amiens - nef depuis le triforium.jpg: 0
3. Nef et choeur.jpg: +1 
=>
Image:Amiens cathédrale21.JPG: Declined. <--
Image:Cathedrale d'Amiens - nef depuis le triforium.jpg: Declined.
Image:Nef et choeur.jpg: Promoted.
--Eusebius (talk) 12:05, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-10-29 14:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Amiens (interior)		 
Scores: 
1. Amiens cathédrale21.JPG: 0
2. Cathedrale d'Amiens - nef depuis le triforium.jpg: 0 <--
3. Nef et choeur.jpg: +1 
=>
Image:Amiens cathédrale21.JPG: Declined.
Image:Cathedrale d'Amiens - nef depuis le triforium.jpg: Declined. <--
Image:Nef et choeur.jpg: Promoted.
--Eusebius (talk) 12:05, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-10-29 14:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Amiens (interior)		 
Scores: 
1. Amiens cathédrale21.JPG: 0
2. Cathedrale d'Amiens - nef depuis le triforium.jpg: 0
3. Nef et choeur.jpg: +1  <--
=>
Image:Amiens cathédrale21.JPG: Declined
Image:Cathedrale d'Amiens - nef depuis le triforium.jpg: Declined.
Image:Nef et choeur.jpg: Promoted.. <--
--Eusebius (talk) 12:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Malva sylvestris (Common mallow)

[edit]
   

View
Nominated by:
Alvesgaspar (talk) on 2008-10-21 23:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Malva sylvestris (Common mallow)
Used in:
Malva sylvestris
I'm not saying that this picture is in competition with yours. I'm just saying that it appears to me that mallow flowers have a pretty specific, regular shape, and that the flower in your picture doesn't show this shape very well. --Eusebius (talk) 06:17, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Mallow January 2008-1.jpg: 0 <--
2. Koeh-222.jpg: 0
=>
Image:Mallow January 2008-1.jpg: Undecided. <--
Image:Koeh-222.jpg: Undecided.
-- Mr. Mario (talk) 00:22, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Commons:Valued image candidates/Malva sylvestris - Köhler–s Medizinal-Pflanzen-222.jpg

Tikal

[edit]
   

View
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-10-29 14:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Tikal
✓ Done --Eusebius (talk) 09:16, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Belize-tikal.jpg: 0 <--
2. Tikal Temple1 2006 08 11.JPG: +1
3. Tikal - vue panoramique du Temple IV.jpg: 0
4. Tikal9.jpg: +1 
=>
Image:Belize-tikal.jpg: Undecided. <--
Image:Tikal Temple1 2006 08 11.JPG: Undecided.
Image:Tikal - vue panoramique du Temple IV.jpg: Undecided.
Image:Tikal9.jpg: Undecided.
--Eusebius (talk) 14:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-10-29 14:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Tikal		 
Scores: 
1. Belize-tikal.jpg: 0
2. Tikal Temple1 2006 08 11.JPG: +1 <--
3. Tikal - vue panoramique du Temple IV.jpg: 0
4. Tikal9.jpg: +1 
=>
Image:Belize-tikal.jpg: Undecided.
Image:Tikal Temple1 2006 08 11.JPG: Undecided. <--
Image:Tikal - vue panoramique du Temple IV.jpg: Undecided.
Image:Tikal9.jpg: Undecided.
--Eusebius (talk) 14:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
[[File:|160px]]
View
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-10-29 14:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Tikal

Scores: 

1. Belize-tikal.jpg: 0
2. Tikal Temple1 2006 08 11.JPG: +1
3. Valued image candidates/Tikal - vue panoramique du Temple IV.jpg: 0 <--
4. Tikal9.jpg: +1 
=>
Image:Belize-tikal.jpg: Undecided.
Image:Tikal Temple1 2006 08 11.JPG: Undecided.
Image:Tikal - vue panoramique du Temple IV.jpg: Undecided. <--
Image:Tikal9.jpg: Undecided.
--Eusebius (talk) 14:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-10-29 14:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Tikal
✓ Done --Eusebius (talk) 09:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It show the acropolis of the city, but none of the larger temples. I guess the right thing for this scope would be a VIS, with every single temple and plaza of the site (but we don't have that). --Eusebius (talk) 12:33, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Belize-tikal.jpg: 0
2. Tikal Temple1 2006 08 11.JPG: +1
3. Tikal - vue panoramique du Temple IV.jpg: 0
4. Tikal9.jpg: +1 <--
=>
Image:Belize-tikal.jpg: Undecided.
Image:Tikal Temple1 2006 08 11.JPG: Undecided.
Image:Tikal - vue panoramique du Temple IV.jpg: Undecided.
Image:Tikal9.jpg: Undecided. <--
--Eusebius (talk) 14:50, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Leontopodium alpinum (Edelweiss)

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-11-08 12:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Leontopodium alpinum (Edelweiss)

Scores: 

1. 5668 - Schynige Platte - Leontopodium alpinum.JPG: 0 <--
2. CH Leontopodium alpinum 2.jpg: +2
=>
Image:5668 - Schynige Platte - Leontopodium alpinum.JPG: Declined. <--
Image:CH Leontopodium alpinum 2.jpg: Promoted.
--Eusebius (talk) 14:53, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-11-08 12:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Leontopodium alpinum (Edelweiss)		 
Scores: 
1. 5668 - Schynige Platte - Leontopodium alpinum.JPG: 0
2. CH Leontopodium alpinum 2.jpg: +2 <--
=>
Image:5668 - Schynige Platte - Leontopodium alpinum.JPG: Declined.
Image:CH Leontopodium alpinum 2.jpg: Promoted. <--
--Eusebius (talk) 14:53, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Anacridium aegyptium (Egyptian grasshopper)

[edit]
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Alvesgaspar (talk) on 2008-11-10 23:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Anacridium aegyptium (Egyptian grasshopper)

 Comment - I think this is the best of the whole bunch in terms of encyclopaedic value -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:47, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply] 

1. Grasshopper November 2008-3.jpg: 0 <--
2. Acrididae grasshopper-2.jpg: +1
=>
Image:Grasshopper November 2008-3.jpg: Declined. <--
Image:Acrididae grasshopper-2.jpg: Promoted.
--Eusebius (talk) 07:10, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-11-17 14:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Anacridium aegyptium (Egyptian grasshopper)		 
1. Grasshopper November 2008-3.jpg: 0
2. Acrididae grasshopper-2.jpg: +1 <--
=>
Image:Grasshopper November 2008-3.jpg: Declined.
Image:Acrididae grasshopper-2.jpg: Promoted. <--
--Eusebius (talk) 07:10, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 

 1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Acrididae grasshopper-2.jpg: +5, -2 (current VI within same scope) <--
 2. Commons:Valued image candidates/Egyptian grasshopper (Anacridium aegyptium) on crab apple (Malus sylvestris) Corfu.jpg: +2, -3

 =>
 File:Acrididae grasshopper-2.jpg: Promoted. Remains as VI. <--
 File:Egyptian grasshopper (Anacridium aegyptium) on crab apple (Malus sylvestris) Corfu.jpg: Declined. 
--Milseburg (talk) 12:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Closed_most_valued_reviews/2008/11&oldid=66096740"