File talk:Heavens Above Her.jpg

Fantastic. Have to say that I think this is one of the greatest pictures I have experienced. Well done. Mr.Dr (talk) 15:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Long exposure photography or collage?

I do not believe that this is a long-exposure photography, as the description says. If the woman was being taken by the camera for the time needed to capture the Milky Way, all the stars would move and would look similar as in the picture File:Night Photography.jpg. It looks as a combination of two (or more) photographs; one of them is a long-exposure photography of the night sky long time after the sunset, and the other one is a common photography of a woman watching the sunset. Jan Kameníček (talk) 06:58, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Agree. I added the term "long-exposure photo" because I felt it was more precise than the original description. As you point out, we can do better still. Feel free to update the description accordingly. -- Ariadacapo (talk) 07:23, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

• I wouldn't qualify this a "long" yet. And *none* of the source pic are long exposure. The short time (combined with a very high ISO) was required to avoid trails in this high resolution. I'll update the description to remove the unecessary. - Benh (talk) 11:42, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
• Please check [1] for more about how it was taken. - Benh (talk) 11:46, 21 July 2016 (UTC)