File:Sperme spermatogenèse délétionFertility2ComonsFL2.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(1,024 × 768 pixels, file size: 131 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
Description
English: If there is no way of interpreting the original data, the steady rhythm of the last 50 years of the twentieth century, men (rich countries) would have serious difficulties to breed around 2025, and an impossibility for Most of them around 2070 ;
The deletion of spermatogenesis is a general decline in sperm production (quantity and quality) observed in humans since the 1950s at least in rich countries (for lack of studies and data available elsewhere);
It presents significant geographic variations in part still not explained, and Finland seemed to be spared (so that one speaks "Finland exception"), while Denmark, which is only separated by the Baltic countries would be the country in Europe where the men lost more sperm from the mid-twentieth century.
Besides Finland, the decline in sperm production appears to affect both men apparently healthy than those who consult a result of difficulties to children in Denmark among men seeking treatment for fertility problems.
When this phenomenon is associated with genital abnormalities may have been induced in utero by a malfunction of the testicle of the embryo, it is called Syndrome testicular dysgenesis. In children it affects, this syndrome is associated with increased risk of developing testicular cancer in early youth or adulthood.
The extent and consequences of this phenomenon in terms of human fertility are still controversial and have been the subject of controversy, often heated in the 1990s. The line represents a trend must still be regarded with caution because the studies used to establish all come from rich countries. It is possible but not certain, that populations isolated and remote sources of pollution may affect male fertility are unaffected by this phenomenon. Moreover, large variations are observed in rich countries, for example between Denmark, strongly affected, and Finland, which seems to affected the least. These differences, in particular highlighted by Niels Skakkebaek (Skakkebaek NE, Rajpert-De Meyt E, Main KM. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common disorder with environmental aspects Developmental. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 972-8) does not appear due to methodological biases can not be explained by "causes" genetic.
Français : S'il n'y a pas de biais d'interprétation des données originales ; au rytme des 50 dernières années du XXème siècle, les hommes (des pays riches) devraient avoir de sérieuses difficultés à se reproduire vers 2025, et une impossibilité pour la plupart d'entre eux vers 2070 ; La délétion de la spermatogenèse consiste en une dégradation générale de la production des spermatozoïdes (quantité et qualité) observé chez l'être humain depuis les années 1950 au moins, dans les pays riches (faute d'études et de données disponibles ailleurs);
Elle présente d'importantes variations géographiques pour partie encore non-expliquées ; ainsi la Finlande semble épargnée au point qu'on parle d'exception finlandaise (ou de paradoxe finlandaise), alors que le Danemark qui n'en est séparé que par la Baltique, serait le pays d'Europe où les hommes ont perdu le plus de spermatozoïdes depuis la moitié du XXe siècle.
Hormis en Finlande, la baisse de production de spermatozoïdes semble toucher autant les hommes en bonne santé apparente, que ceux qui consultent suite à des difficultés à faire des enfants au Danemark chez les hommes qui consultent pour problème de fertilité.
Quand ce phénomène est associé à des malformations génitales susceptibles d'avoir été induite in utero par un dysfonctionnement du testicule de l'embryon, on parle de Syndrome de dysgénésie testiculaire. Chez l'enfant qu'il affecte, ce syndrome est associé à l'augmentation du risque de développer un cancer du testicule, dans la prime jeunesse ou à l'âge adulte.
L'ampleur et les conséquences de ce phénomène, en termes de fertilité humaine, sont encore discutées et ont fait l'objet de controverses, parfois vives dans les années 1990. La ligne qui correspond à une tendance, doit encore être considérée avec précaution, car les études qui ont servi à l'établir proviennent toutes de pays riches. Il est possible, mais non certain, que des populations isolées et éloignées de sources de pollution susceptibles d'affecter la fertilité masculine soient épargnées par ce phénomène. De plus, de fortes variations sont observées dans les pays riches, par exemple entre le Danemark, fortement touché, et la Finlande qui semble le pays le moins touché. Ces différences notamment mises en évidence par Niels Skakkebaek (Skakkebaek NE, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Main KM. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects. Hum Reprod 2001 ; 16 : 972-8) ne semblent pas dues à des biais méthodologiques ni ne peuvent être expliquées par des "causes" génétiques.
Date
Source Own work
Author Lamiot
Other versions other version

Les données correspondant aux points jaune proviennent d'une méta-analayse. Elles sont commentées en français dans l'ouvrage "Pesticides, le piège se referme" publié en France par François Veillerette, aux Édition Terre vivante, 2002.

Licensing

[edit]
I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following licenses:
GNU head Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License.
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution share alike
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, 2.5 Generic, 2.0 Generic and 1.0 Generic license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
You may select the license of your choice.
Warning: One or more elements in this file are protected by copyright

Some parts of this file (inset sperm and pedometer images) are not fully free but believed to be de minimis for this work. Derivatives of this file which focus more on the non-free element(s) may not qualify as de minimis and may be copyright violations. As a direct consequence, cropped versions of this file may require a review of their copyright status.

This information template was included because the inset images might be copyrighted because they are not work of the author of the graph.

See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sperme spermatogenèse délétionFertility2ComonsFL2.jpg.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current15:47, 8 May 2010Thumbnail for version as of 15:47, 8 May 20101,024 × 768 (131 KB)Lamiot (talk | contribs){{Information |Description={{en|1=If there is no way of interpreting the original data, the steady rhythm of the last 50 years of the twentieth century, men (rich countries) would have serious difficulties to breed around 2025, and an impossibility for Mo

There are no pages that use this file.

File usage on other wikis

The following other wikis use this file:

Metadata