File:Hubble's Variable Nebula - NGC 2261.png
Original file (1,507 × 1,490 pixels, file size: 3.85 MB, MIME type: image/png)
Captions
Summary[edit]
DescriptionHubble's Variable Nebula - NGC 2261.png |
This is a reprocessing of one of the older Hubble Heritage releases. I believe that when it was originally processed that the individuals responsible did the best they could with the tools they had. Better software and faster computing allow me to improve significantly upon the original, which was created in 1999. This object lies along the Milky Way's dusty plane in the constellation Monoceros. One of my favorite things about this kind of nebula is that it reminds us that there can be a lot unseen in space. An optical illusion is produced by human intuition: it may look to you as though this is a bright cloud against a dark surface. In reality, this is a small hole in a largely unseen cloud which allows for light from a newly forming star to shine through. The variation in the nebula is most likely caused by shadows being cast by blobs of dust accreting near the young star. Note that the accretion process and the star itself are impossible to see in this image, and they occur at a scale too small and too distant for Hubble to see in any detail. The presence of the dusty knots and their close proximity to the star can be inferred by the shadows they cast and how fast they move across the nebula. Because the nebula is around a light year in size, the shadows appear to flow outward, which demonstrates to us the speed of light (or the speed of darkness?) in a way that I find profoundly beautiful. Wouldn't it be wonderful if the telescope could observe this object many more times so we could watch the light flow lazily through the Universe? I found a ground-based animation of the nebula's variation here: www.umanitoba.ca/faculties/science/astronomy/cbrown/imagi... Some more information and the original news release is here: hubblesite.org/image/904/news_release/1999-35 An APOD is here: apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap991020.html Data collected for Proposal 5574 made this image possible. WF/PC2 Cycle 4: Polarization Proposal Red: F814W;POLQ Green: F675W;POLQ Blue: F555W;POLQ North is 120° clockwise from up. |
Date | |
Source | Hubble's Variable Nebula - NGC 2261 |
Author | Judy Schmidt from Fresh Meadows, NY, USA |
Licensing[edit]
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by geckzilla at https://flickr.com/photos/54209675@N00/34436743884. It was reviewed on 14 June 2017 by FlickreviewR and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0. |
14 June 2017
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 20:39, 14 June 2017 | 1,507 × 1,490 (3.85 MB) | Fabian RRRR (talk | contribs) | =={{int:filedesc}}== {{Information |Description=This is a reprocessing of one of the older Hubble Heritage releases. I believe that when it was originally processed that the individuals responsible did the best they could with the tools they had. Bette... |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on bs.wikipedia.org
- Usage on de.wikipedia.org
- Usage on en.wikipedia.org
- Usage on mk.wikipedia.org
- Usage on pl.wikipedia.org
- Usage on sl.wikipedia.org
- Usage on vi.wikipedia.org
- Usage on zh.wikipedia.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Software used |
---|