Comment Sure, but my problem is: I have no idea of which pictures (among all the Tibet pictures we have, and based on categorization) represent this particular valley, so it's difficult to say it's the most valuable. This issue is probably not very important. However, the link in the scope points to an article using another orthograph (is there an "official" english transcription?) and dealing with a town, not a valley! Very few is said there about the valley, except that the town and an observatory are situated there. It makes me unsure about the relevance of the scope (although it is very subjective, so even though I don't support right now, I wouldn't oppose the candidate either). --Eusebius (talk) 09:34, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
InfoI suspect given its remote location, the only thing notable about the valley is that it has a town in it,hence the structure of the article. Looking around the Tibet categories, I've gone ahead and recategorized a bunch of images, but I do admit it is a difficult nomination. MBisanztalk14:51, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
