Commons:Valued image candidates/Wenecja wąskotorówka.JPG

Wenecja wąskotorówka.JPG

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Albertus teolog (talk) on 2008-10-30 14:40 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Steam locomotive Pacyfic (Les Ateliers métallurgiques, Nivelles)
Used in	Global usage fr:Voie étroite, pl:Muzeum Kolei Wąskotorowej w Wenecji
Review (criteria)	Comment I'm not sure the picture illustrates the scope well (the photograph is more about the vehicle than about the museum). If you can identify the locomotive precisely, I think it would be a far better scope. --Eusebius (talk) 14:58, 30 October 2008 (UTC) A real rarity is the Belgian locomotive made by Les Ateliers Metallurgiques Nivelles with the unique wheel arrangement 2-3-1 ("Pacific"), and the only one which has steam brakes. (1) Albertus teolog (talk) 17:20, 30 October 2008 (UTC)  Info Scope changed Albertus teolog (talk) 17:20, 30 October 2008 (UTC)  Question Is there a reason for the "y" in "Pacific"? Info: apparently the actual name of the maker is "La Métallurgique", situated in Nivelles, Belgium (current name: La Brugeoise et Nivelles SA). Categorization should be improved, if possible. --Eusebius (talk) 17:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)  Info The official name of the manufacturer at that time was "Ateliers Métallurgiques de Nivelles". There where several "Ateliers Métallurgiques" at that time. --Foroa (talk) 19:33, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Are you sure about that? It is clearly written Les ateliers métallurgiques" on the plaque (with "Nivelles" on the following line). --Eusebius (talk) 19:40, 1 November 2008 (UTC)  Info The name comes from the description in the museum (white plate): "Parowóz z tendrem typu Pacyfic" ("Steam locomotive with tender, type Pacyfic"). Here is a more visible name of the factory. Categories are changed. Albertus teolog (talk) 19:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)  Comment A last detail: I would put a coma before Nivelles (or remove it totally), since it is not the name of the manufacturer but its location. --Eusebius (talk) 06:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC) Done. I trust you. :-) Albertus teolog (talk) 08:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC) Thanks, but I meant, in the scope! :-) --Eusebius (talk) 09:42, 31 October 2008 (UTC) Ech... :-) Albertus teolog (talk) 12:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)  Support Looks ok to me (I've corrected french typography in the scope). --Eusebius (talk) 13:16, 31 October 2008 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 21:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)