Comment If this image has been extracted from one of your other images in the scope category, there should be an extraction label in the image description.
The plane is currently cropped very tight to the edges in this image. If there is any more room in the original image, particularly at the front and sides, cropping the plane to give it a little more space in the image would work better.
GPS coordinates for the location would also be helpful for long term use of this imate in Commons as recommended in COM:VIS.
While there are no domain-specific scope recommendations for airplanes, the registration number can change with operator and country of registration. A better scope would be operator, type of aircraft and registration number with “view from below: as sub-scope. Suggest a scope closer to “Turkish Cargo Boeing 777F aircraft (TC-LJR) – view from below” --GRDN711 (talk) 01:52, 21 August 2023 (UTC).[reply]
@GRDN711: I didn't extract it from any other image, I cropped the sides to match the spaces at the top and bottom. In the original pic, I have space on the sides only. Should I upload that one?
I would have added the geo, but as I have photographed quite a lot of airplanes, I don't exactly remember where did I take this picture. Unfortunately, my camera also don't have GPS.
Fabian Roudra Baroi I saw that the rest of your images in the scope link category were horizontal and thought this one was cropped out of one of them. Given your explanation, just leave this image as is. It is OK.
Still think your original scope could be more complete. Feel free to use my suggestion or modify yours as you think better.
11.jpg)
11.jpg){kind=link}
11.jpg){kind=link}
11.jpg){kind=link}
