Oppose I was not fast enough to vote on the other lens nominations, but I do not particularly fancy that the scope relates to a specific macro lens model. Rather I would prefer a scope, like "macro lens", and you could possibly also persuade me into accepting a suitable subscope thereof, specifying, e.g., a specialized usage, but not "Tamron SP AF-180mm F/3.5 Di Macro Lens". --Slaunger (talk) 21:19, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Scope is OK now. I do not think I have the competences needed to evaluate the image though under the new scope. --Slaunger (talk) 10:42, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That would be an OK scope for me. (I do not have the competences needed to actually review the nomination, then, but I know there are other lens specialists here, who would be qualified to review it). --Slaunger (talk) 08:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support because it is easily distinguished from a shorter focal length macro lens, as the Nikkor 105 mm might not; i.e., it illustrated the scope better. Walter Siegmund(talk)15:18, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
