High def picture of a male, pretty rare on the internet for what I've watched. We possibly already have a female on this picture : the second specimen, but I'm not a specialist! -- Totodu74 (talk)
Oppose Opposition temporary. We can not promote this very beautiful image, very didactic in this scope, we must add the word "drawing" in scope. The day we have the photograph of the specimen there is a potential conflict. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support I beg to disagree. Usually, when a VIC is a photograph, we don't add the word "photograph" is the scope. VI means Valued Image, so a drawing can compete without a special mention or subscope IMO. The day we have a photograph of the specimen, we'll juste have to open a MVR to choose the most valuable image between the two pictures :-) PS: I dare support because I trust your opinion about the illustrative value of this image for this scope. --Myrabella (talk) 07:05, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
