Comment I'd rather be more generic on the scope. I'm not sure this particular ship is remarkable enough for a scope or an article, although the kind of ship may be. Would you propose some alternatives? --Eusebius (talk) 15:37, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Hmm, I catch your drift, but generalizing in this particular case is a bit tough. The ship on the picture is a beam trawler or shrimp trawler, but on this trip we had chartered it for scientific work and it was fitted with a bottom sledge for sampling bivalves. The typical beam trawls were not on board that week: the beams are there, the trawls are not. So that is why the scope is more about the ship than about the fishing technique. Lycaon (talk) 07:22, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I was hoping that its scientific equipment was remarkable enough to justify a scope, but maybe it's not the case, probably it's not visible enough on the picture? To me, the ship in itself is not worth a scope. --Eusebius (talk) 09:34, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
