Commons:Valued image candidates/Modeltrain2.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Modeltrain2.jpg

undecided
Image
Nominated by Wuzur (talk) on 2008-07-14 13:29 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
model locomotive
Used in

Global usage

de:Modelleisenbahn, de:Märklin, en:Märklin
Review
(criteria)
  •  OpposeRevised vote due to scope change. -- Slaunger (talk) 15:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC) It is a nice and valuable photo of a model locomotive, but I think there are quite a few photos on Commons which are better at illustrating the scope, which is Rail transport modelling. For me, a good and valuable image of the stated scope not only shows a model locomotive but also its interaction with its surroundings, such as model rails, bridges, town, people, tunnels, crossings, signals and so on. Thus, I think, e.g., Image:Kranwagen46716.JPG is better. I suggest adjusting the scope to, e.g., model locomotive. I have not checked to see if there are better candidates witin that scope, but I will if you change it. -- Slaunger (talk) 23:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info I changed the scope. --Wuzur (talk) 11:05, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scope changed from Rail transport modeling to model locomotive Dr. Schorsch (talk) 11:42, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

  •  Neutral There are a lot og model locomotive images on Commons. I am no expert in the subject, but the Märklin train shown IMO a very good example of good model locomotive photo, but there are other images, which may be just as good. For instance, I think Image:LGB Spreewald IMGP2928 wp.jpg is also a good illustration of an (outdoor) model locomotive. So I end up as being undecided. Users more knowledgeable in the field may have more qualified opinions. -- Slaunger (talk) 15:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 neutral
=> Undecided. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]