Comment While I have absolutely no intend to oppose this image, I am a bit worried about 'co-nominations' like this kind where support is agreed upon in advance by two users. Lycaon (talk) 08:24, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Candidate is ok for me. About Lycaon's remark: inviting new contributions to the project is very ok (thank you for that), but we should avoid promising a support, or explicitly asking somebody for a support, as it has occured with other users already. --Eusebius (talk) 09:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
@Lycaon. I do not think I've done something wrong here. The user asked me to look over his images and tell him which one IMO could be VI. I did, I reviewed the images and tried to explain the difference between VI and QI to the user. I knew I would support the image for both VI and QI. What's wrong in telling this to the user? After few declined images on QI, I believed the user could use some encouragement. In any case, if you believe that somebody is guily of wrongdoing here, it is only me, and me alone, not Yann. So instead of "two users", may I please ask you to say "Mbz1". Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 10:30, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support For a moment, I considered if File:Mehndi1.JPG would be better in review size as, due to the close-up you can better see the details in the Mehndi patterns. But, I think the nominated image wins because it shows the extent of the Mehndi on the arms and legs. The flash lightning reflecting on the shiny cloth underneath is a little unfortunate and gives a little bad contrast in the image. But still a good illustration of the scope. --Slaunger (talk) 21:59, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
