Commons:Valued image candidates/McD-Filet-O-Fish.jpg

McDonald's Filet-O-Fish sandwich (1).jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	George Ho (talk) on 2012-05-23 02:11 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Filet-O-Fish
Used in	Global usage
Reason	Out of three pictures within the scope, this picture is the best. -- George Ho (talk)
Review (criteria)	Support Best in scope. cmadler (talk) 13:35, 23 May 2012 (UTC)  Comment - Is there some significant visual difference between most of the McDonald's sandwiches? I think there isn't. I think we need here just one scope: „McDonald's sandwiches” and that's all!--MrPanyGoff 07:01, 27 May 2012 (UTC) "McDonald's sandwiches" is a broader scope. If I must nominate all sandwiches this sandwich as part of the "McDonald's sandwiches" scope, then I must nominate ALL sandwiches as a set. --George Ho (talk) 19:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC) By the way, Category:McDonald's products and Category:McDonald's products - breads. --George Ho (talk) 20:27, 27 May 2012 (UTC) See here: McChicken.jpg - one and the same. --MrPanyGoff 21:15, 27 May 2012 (UTC) The difference between the Fish and the Chicken is the patty. The fact that the buns are the same is irrelevant. By the way, that image is also a candidate for the Most Valued Image of McChicken. What's your point? --George Ho (talk) 21:35, 27 May 2012 (UTC) The difference is not only the patty, but also the toppings. "McDonald's sandwiches" would be as broad a scope as "Disney movies", "Verdi operas", or "Structures by Le Corbusier". It's too broad. cmadler (talk) 14:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC)  Support DimiTalen 15:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC) Result: 2 support, 0 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 19:17, 30 May 2012 (UTC)