Commons:Valued image candidates/Mask of Amenemope1.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Mask of Amenemope1.jpg

promoted
Image
Nominated by Leoboudv (talk) on 2009-04-05 06:03 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amenemope
Used in

Global usage

fr:Aménémopé , en:Pharaoh Amenemope , de:Amenemope
Review
(criteria)
  •  Comment The scope looks more like a description than a scope... I would support the picture with a scope limited to this pharaoh ("Amenemope"). "Ancient Egyptian funerary masks" would be a nice scope, but with much competition, maybe. --Eusebius (talk) 13:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I have changed the focus to Pharaoh Amenemope as you requested Eusebius. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:59, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Little misunderstanding... First, that was only a suggestion, not a request. Plus, I suggested the scope to be simply "Amenemope", and nothing about the mask itself. I think the character is a nice scope, Egyptian funerary masks make a nice scope, but the funerary mask of a given Pharaoh is too narrow for me. --Eusebius (talk) 21:07, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I have revised the scope to what you suggested. Thank You for your suggestion. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Thanks. We have two masks for this pharaoh, I think this one has the best lighting and thus makes a better illustration. I think the picture should have an approximate geotag for the Cairo museum. --Eusebius (talk) 05:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Actually I was the person who managed to get the 2 masks of Amenemope here. Before, there was nothing and the Cairo Museum has banned all photography in their building since 2005. I don't know how to do a geotag unfortunately. All I know is Cairo's coordinates are latitude = 30°03'N and longitude = 31°22'E . --Leoboudv (talk) 06:11, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'll add the geotag when I have some time. --Eusebius (talk) 06:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Eusebius (talk) 13:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 06:32, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
[reply]