Support I still have to look twice to recognize the item as a knife, even at full res, but sure I withdraw my Oppose. And I'm well aware of the differences between QI, VI, and FP ... --Pjt56 (talk) 14:43, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
To Pjt56: be aware that Valued Images are not the same thing as Quality Images. In particular, technical quality isn't of such importance. VI rules say: For photographs, the quality achievable using the built-in camera in a modern mobile phone should normally be good enough. The image must look good on-screen at the review size. VI must meet these 6 criteria. A VI is the most valuable illustration of all images on Commons which fall within the scope of the nomination. Note that most valuable does not necessarily imply the best technical quality. Valued images are less about perfect technical quality and more about your ingenuity in finding good and valuable subjects which matter, and about the useability of the information on the image page, see Valued image value for further details. --Myrabella (talk) 10:05, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am ready to support, but I'd like to make a suggestion: could you add the name of some of the picked species we can see in the basket? Something like "Edible fungi in basket (xxx, yyy, etc)". That will make this image even more valuable. --Myrabella (talk) 17:07, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
