Hmm, there are several interior photos on Commons to choose from - I uploaded them myself. But the interior is rather regular, it's just a football court with lots of seats around it, just like many others and by far not as unique and spectacular as the exterior, and definitely not illustrating the scope better, in particular if you're interested in the building's architecture. Please keep in mind that this is a rather special construction where the roof is completely independent of the building. You can tear down the building and the roof still stands. You cannot see any of this from the inside. But if you're really concerned about the interior, maybe it would be wise to split the scope into BayArena exterior and BayArena interior? -- H005 (talk) 20:22, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Comment From the VI rules: When appropriate, the building scope can be divided in a "XXX (exterior)" scope and a "XXX (interior)" scope -- H005 (talk) 18:22, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
