As we have at least three picture of the same work of art by Jean-Marie Bonnassieux, with its own category, it could be relevant to distinguish one of them in my opinion. -- Jebulon (talk)
Oppose I'm bothered by the blacking out of the background. This is not a painting which might be relocated and to which the surroundings are incidental, it's a statue which (I believe) is permanently located in this spot. Therefore, I think there's more value in showing the work in its actual setting. cmadler (talk) 02:41, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I understand what you mean. Please have a look at the other pictures of the same. The background is horrible, and has no interest. The statue is located in a very dark area (noisy, if photographed, in any case). Please notice that the subject is only the statue (giving his name to the church) and his artistic merits, and the black background isolates well from distracting elements, with absolute no value. Thanks for review anyway.--Jebulon (talk) 10:34, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You think I must add a gallery, when the subject has already his own category ?--Jebulon (talk) 10:34, 3 February 2012 (UTC). OK for the confusing double link in scope, I agree.--Jebulon (talk) 10:37, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I strongly think that valued candidates need to have a both a gallery and a categorization. The effort dwarfs the visibility effect. พ.s.10:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
