You nominated the single image as a set as can be seen as it is the set templates ({{VISC}} and {{VISC-thumb}}), which are used on the review page instead of the Valued image candidate templates ({{VIC}} and {{VIC-thumb}}). Don't worry, I can fix that part of it, I think. Just be careful to nominate correctly the next time ;-) -- Slaunger (talk) 20:27, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey thanks for that! I'm not familiar with the detailed intricacies of the VIC template, so I was at a loss at what had gone wrong here. Lycaon (talk) 20:38, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. You just accidentally pasted your image name in the wrong edit box. Actually, I am surprised this has not happened before, because they look quite similar. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Info I just modified the labels on the "Create...nomination" buttons such that the image and set nominations are distinct. Hopefully, that will minimize the risk of accidentally hitting the wrong button in the future. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:52, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, there are two daylight pictures (here and here), but with an ugly building shadow and stronger distorsion (although the latter might be correctible, I don't know).
Support although reluctantly... I agree with Berthold Werner that a daylight photo is more suitable at illustrating the subject, but I think the nominated image is just so illuminated that it makes the cut for me. The other daylight versions are very close competitors, but the shadows really kill them. If it is possible for you to retake it, i recommend taking a shot at a time of time when the whole facade is illuminated by sun. Prefereably in the morning or evening - if possible. But until then i think this is (just) the most valued image we have of the scope. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:26, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I don't live in Amiens, otherwise I would have taken other pictures (with a tripod for the picture by night, and at a better time for the daylight ones). Eusebius (talk) 21:17, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
