Commons:Valued image candidates/Керамика Золотой Орды ГИМ.JPG

Керамика Золотой Орды ГИМ.JPG

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Twdragon (talk) on 2008-09-30 08:50 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Golden Horde ceramic
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Oppose Please propose a scope. --Eusebius (talk) 09:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)  Done -- Scope proposed --Twdragon (talk) 09:07, 30 September 2008 (UTC)  Oppose Missing geotag, uncategorized, scope is too narrow (would probably be more suited as a description of the picture in English, unavailable for the moment). I think "Golden Horde ceramic" would be a better scope. --Eusebius (talk) 12:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC)  Done Scope changed --Twdragon (talk) 14:57, 2 October 2008 (UTC) I think you can drop the "Ancient", since any Golden Horde ceramic would be ancient. --Eusebius (talk) 15:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)  Support Nice representation of the atmosphere around clay pottery. (Ancient) Clay pottery might be a better scope. --Foroa (talk) 20:16, 30 September 2008 (UTC)  Comment "Ancient Clay pottery" is a too broad scope. --Pere prlpz (talk) 12:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)  Comment To me, "clay pottery" is very precise and focused as scope. Can we be more focused and precise than that ? (unless you want valued images from each possible place in the world that produces clay pottery). --Foroa (talk) 12:59, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I would be ok with "Clay pottery" or "Ancient clay pottery" as a scope, but then we would have to go through all the pictures representing clay pottery and decide whether this one is the most illustrative or not. Since we don't have a "clay pottery" cat yet, it's a lot of work. Personally, I am not able to classify the several kinds of ceramics; we must find somebody who is. --Eusebius (talk) 13:07, 1 October 2008 (UTC) Scope changed from Golden Horde ceramic ware from State Historical Museum, Moscow to Golden Horde ceramic --sign here Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".  Comment Can you please sign the scope change template, Twdragon? --Eusebius (talk) 08:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)  Support Anyway, I'm ok with this scope. --Eusebius (talk) 12:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC) Result: 1 support => Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 10:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)