I noticed this as the picture of the day on the Polish Wikipedia today and was suprised it was not a featured image here. --03:56, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
SVG version with a more harmonic colour composition. Not a FP candidate.another vector version. Not a FP candidate.
Oppose The decorative text on the wing is pointless and distracting, and the color palette could be more coherent. It also should be SVG. – flamurai06:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I would try making the picture a little more sober (colours, numbers, text in wing,...). I think decoration distracts from the information depicted. Also, the illustration would be more clear with a longer wing.Alvesgaspar12:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Please remove the decorative text and convert it to SVG. The "Wiki Air" on the winglet has basically the same effect as a watermark crediting the Wikis. Zzyzx1108:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support useful diagram. The text on the wing, engines, etc doesn't worry me, after all, real plane wings have it on too. And why should it be turned into svg? Just to make it inaccessible to those who don't have svg-compatible computers? - MPF19:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Every SVG is rendered to an PNG by the mediawiki software. If it's an SVG, it's scalable and can be accessed in two ways: as SVG or as rendered PNG. norro20:20, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
But only as the thumbnail - you can no longer "Download high resolution version (1024x968, 218 KB)" once it has been converted to svg - MPF02:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it there is - you can make image with overscaled size, eg. [[image:Test.svg|10000px]] will give you image 10000px width :) --WarX10:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. 1) should be SVG. 2) shouldn't have CC-BY-SA in the image. If you want to put that in metadata that is fine. The signing of the image is creative enough that I don't think I'd oppose for it :O I don't really mind the decorative text. There are various images with 'Wiki' things where a brand name might be. But, I suppose I can see why people might not want it. gren18:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I tried to create a vector version of this image. I used a more harmonic colour palette and removed the text. See thumb at the right. norro22:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's great to see the development here... I don't think the last picture (long wing seen from the front) should be turned - it would be enough to see it from a bit a higher point until the now hidden parts can also be seen --Anna reg18:49, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Info created by PioM - uploaded by PioM - nominated by Cary "Bastiq▼e" Bass demandez
Support as nom. --Cary "Bastiq▼e" Bass demandez 03:56, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Oppose The decorative text on the wing is pointless and distracting, and the color palette could be more coherent. It also should be SVG. – flamurai 06:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Comment I tried to create a vector version of this image. I used a more harmonic colour palette and removed the text. See thumb at the right. norro 22:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
