Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Crassula capitella 2 edit.jpg

Info created by Eric in SF - uploaded by Eric in SF - nominated by Rkitko --Rkitko 03:03, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rkitko 03:03, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very low DOF. Sorry --Beyond silence 03:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment No need to say sorry. I expected comments on the DOF. Personally, I think the DOF choice in this photo increases its aesthetic. --Rkitko 14:46, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The DoF is fine, because the plane of sharpness is properly oriented: the entire top of the plant has even sharpness. The colors are amazing too. The problem here is the composition, where the view just uncomfortably falls off the bottom of the picture. -- Ram-Man 22:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Exactly so! First, I would get rid of the top half of the picture, and then, I would rotate it 90 degrees (180º?). Alvesgaspar 23:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Lycaon 16:28, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Is this what you had in mind? Rkitko 01:32, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the colors. -- Ram-Man 01:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mbz1 01:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)mbz1[reply]
Oppose I don't like this composition. --Beyond silence 03:23, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 18:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I made an edit:I cropped the picture (I agree with Alvesgaspar) with a slight rotation, but I didn't rotate it upside down because the lighting seemed unnatural to me. Vassil 01:41, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the colors. -- Ram-Man 01:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mbz1 01:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
Support - Indeed, the rotation look unnatural no matter which way I flipped it. I like this version better. Though I would choose to crop off the additional green distraction at the top of the second edit. Rkitko 02:01, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Personally I think that it's ok. You don't want to crop too close. The biggest problem with the original was the huge percentage of top distracted from the bottom. This one is well-balanced I think. -- Ram-Man 02:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Yes ! - Alvesgaspar 08:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So: Support Vassil 09:16, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Luc Viatour 12:41, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Digon3 ^talk 12:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - —the preceding unsigned comment was added by Noumenon (talk • contribs)
Support --Böhringer 20:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support /Daniel78 07:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 18:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another try with a little more rotation --wau > 14:12, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this one, too. --Rkitko 14:36, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Malene Thyssen 18:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Question Could the different edits be labeled?. I am confused to which vote section belongs to which edit. /Daniel78 21:07, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. --Simonizer 22:12, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contents