Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Brombeerlaub.jpg

Image:Brombeerlaub.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2009 at 22:59:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/Image:Brombeerlaub.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Brombeerlaub.jpg

•  Info created by je-str - uploaded by je-str - nominated by je-str -- Je-str (talk) 22:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Je-str (talk) 22:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Absolutely fantastic. AlexAH (talk) 23:29, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment There's some posterization quality issues on second look, I can't tell for sure if it's posterization in the top left corner, and the file size is very small (less than a Mbyte). I doubt this was uploaded at the best quality. I'm sure this can be arranged. I'll support if it is. --S23678 (talk) 23:49, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose Quality issues were not adressed --S23678 (talk) 16:22, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment quality issues revised je-str (talk) 18:36, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

• Please explain the modifications you did, as I still see very visible banding in the sky. As well, was this picture taken with a FinePix F30 (a camera you used in other uploads)? I hope no, since this image would be twice as big as your sensor resolution...! --S23678 (talk) 17:42, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Support.--— Erin (talk) 07:43, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support This is beautiful, though the quality issues mentioned above should be adressed. -- JovanCormac 08:04, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Yes. Takabeg (talk) 11:23, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Categories? Easy subject and the quality is far from perfect. —kallerna™ 12:55, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I do not like the crop and the changing color of the background (the sky I assume). Nice image, but not special enough IMO.Sorry.--Mbz1 (talk) 02:42, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment You are absolutely right, I could superimpose a flawless sky.But I believe, genuine is the original sky. je-str (talk) 19:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

• Genuine? Nothing in photography is genuine or "original". It's always images. Do you think the way we see the world through the human eye is genuine? --Ernie (talk) 15:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Support per JovanCormac. --.dsm. 08:52, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:46, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

•  Oppose - come to this a bit late, but it does not appear to be a Rubus species, as the filename suggests. More information needed. - MPF (talk) 15:08, 21 November 2009 (UTC)