Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wwii woman worker-edit.jpg

File:Wwii woman worker-edit.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2015 at 13:37:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Wwii woman worker-edit.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wwii woman worker-edit.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical.
•  Info created by David Bransby, uploaded by Liftarn, nominated by -- Yann (talk) 13:37, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Yann (talk) 13:37, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Has something on hers nose and upper lip but the quality,the image size,the expression and freckles.... I really like--LivioAndronico talk 15:03, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

• Fo a historic photo of course--LivioAndronico talk 15:04, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Support outstanding 70+ years old photo. And the freckles .... --Pugilist (talk) 17:53, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
•  strong oppose Do our quality standards mean nothing? Yes, it's a great photo but whoever edited it or created the JPG has trashed it. Have a look at File:Woman aircraft worker, Vega Aircraft Corporation, Burbank, Calif.1a34456u.tif, the original tiff, and examine the background. The JPG presented here has such obvious blocky artefacts you could play Tetris with them. This is an image worthy of careful restoration, by someone who knows what they are doing, and I'm sure someone at FP could be found to do that. -- Colin (talk) 18:41, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • @Colin: New version uploaded: rework from TIFF, less compression, and also correction of issues mentioned by Livio. Yann (talk) 19:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Better now. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 10:45, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Kruusamägi (talk) 09:04, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Support 30 years later, I will remove the Weak ;) --Laitche (talk) 10:17, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Umm please don't misunderstand the above comment, I don't mean the World War II. It's a very good quality of 70+ years old, a photo but not a big event in the history historical moment, it's a working lady, so. --Laitche (talk) 10:46, 18 April 2015 (UTC) --Laitche (talk) 10:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment actually the "working lady" does in fact represent a minor historical turn: Rosie the Riveter --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
      • @Martin Falbisoner: Yeah, that's why I support this, similar things(Women's volunteer corps which was organized during WWII, in 1943) happened in my country, if just a working I wouldn't. --Laitche (talk) 07:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
      • I think “a big historical moment” is rather suitable than “a big event in the history”, so I've changed the sentence. --Laitche (talk) 10:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:46, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I like the colors. D kuba (talk) 11:43, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --El Grafo (talk) 11:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:57, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:28, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical