Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Webysther 20190306142802 - Edifício Altino Arantes.jpg

File:Webysther 20190306142802 - Edifício Altino Arantes.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2019 at 17:19:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Webysther 20190306142802 - Edifício Altino Arantes.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Webysther 20190306142802 - Edifício Altino Arantes.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
•  Info created by Webysther - uploaded by Webysther - nominated by Webysther -- Webysther (talk) 17:19, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Abstain -- Webysther (talk) 17:19, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose  Support A FP-composition but unfortunately it needs a serious perspective correction. The right part is leaning to the right and the left part is leaning tot the left. --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:44, 10 March 2019 (UTC). Perspective fixed, so you got my support --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Question - Is perspective correction normally required for drone pics? I'm certainly impressed and hope Webysther resolves this issue, if people agree that it should be resolved. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:46, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

• You have to find a compromise during taking pictures. If the camera is straight, interesting details may become invisible. If it's too much inclined, perspective correction may spoil the whole picture. A bit inclined downwards and then perspective correction is mostly recommendable --A.Savin 15:28, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Neutral pending possible correction of perspective.  Support now Daniel Case (talk) 05:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Have a look at User:A.Savin's drone/aerial photos (In the above FP page/section for Russia). I think he either corrects them or ensures the camera is level. -- Colin (talk) 12:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not an excellent picture for me --Fischer.H (talk) 18:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak support I would be much more enthusiastic about this one if the perspective were corrected, but I think the visual interest of the view tips it over into FP for me. Cmao20 (talk) 20:50, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks for fixing the perspective. A strong candidate by my reckoning now. Cmao20 (talk) 19:50, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Info Fixed perspective -- Webysther (talk) 17:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support. Webysther, you should ping everyone who's voted (support, neutral or oppose) or commented in this thread (except me). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC) Ikan, you are right! --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:51, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

• @A.Savin, Fischer.H, Daniel Case, and Colin: thanks for the tip! :) -- Webysther (talk) 02:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing special, I do not see reason for nomination. -- Karelj (talk) 13:55, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose It shouts for a panoramic view. Furthermore it needs a perspective correction, both sides are leaning out --Poco² 12:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support after correcting perspective --KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 19:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes