Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Titian - Venus with a Mirror - Google Art Project.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2021 at 21:43:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Nudes
Info created by Titian - uploaded by DcoetzeeBot - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 21:43, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Support -- Andrei (talk) 21:43, 13 October 2021 (UTC)- Support --Yann (talk) 22:13, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Comment I know it is an old discussion, but I still don’t understand what we are supposed to judge here (and same for the nomination below). Should I vote against a work by Tiziano ? Should I say NO because I dislike cubism (below) ? Ridiculous. As the picture is taken by a bot with the maximum technical but automatic quality available (ok, there are men behind the machine blablabla), it is obviously excellent. Furthermore, I don’t understand why such a picture would benefit of a FP star. Of course I understand and agree with the upload in Commons of GoogleArt Project pictures, but they don’t need labels IMO. Do we have « nominated but not promoted as FP » GoogleArt Project pictures ? I cannot support, I cannot oppose, I can even not remain neutral. So I 
Abstain .--Jebulon (talk) 22:36, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Info see here an example of a fail --Andrei (talk) 23:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Info its sometimes about technical quality of reproduction. google art does not mean its great. curating skills and common sense are also applicable. for example, this institution has 80 items but i would consider nominating five. --Andrei (talk) 23:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support. I think my answer, Jebulon, is that photography is partly for documentation, and this humongous, sharp reproduction is a great document. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:40, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support according to Ikan's argumentation. Sometimes I like a painting more, sometimes less. When I like it, the support is very clear. If I don't like it so much, but the resolution is outstanding, then I also support it because I have respect for the art and I am grateful that Commons is enriched with these works. Great art deserves a feature, regardless of personal taste. It is part of the cultural identity of mankind. This is just my humble opinion and an evaluation of the above comment. This painting I like, as well as the cubist work of Leo Gestel. Many regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 23:50, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Further Comment on Jebulon's thoughts: Yes, I do take into account my regard for an artwork and whether it's important in some way. I won't vote against a reproduction of a famous painting because I dislike the painting, but there are a lot of situations in which I don't vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:54, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support Impressive resolution, I enjoy the level of details and the paint cracks at full size -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:59, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Commonists 09:38, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support Incredible resolution, very useful to study Titian’s brushwork and the aging of the painting. --Aristeas (talk) 13:07, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support Lovely painting. Cmao20 (talk) 13:59, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 14:05, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:17, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:10, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/People#Nudes
