Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schiffswrack-Uwe-Hamburg-3341-msu-2021-.jpg

File:Schiffswrack-Uwe-Hamburg-3341-msu-2021-.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2023 at 12:20:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Schiffswrack-Uwe-Hamburg-3341-msu-2021-.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schiffswrack-Uwe-Hamburg-3341-msu-2021-.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Shipwrecks
•  Info created and uploaded by Matthias Süßen - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 12:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support The long exposure times makes for an appealingly strange overall impression. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:16, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose imo it has unnecessary motion blur on the background. I would prefer this one. -- Ivar (talk) 15:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

• Your suggested version has been added as alternative. -- IamMM (talk) 18:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

•  Support I like this version, too, that motion blur makes it even more mystic ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 08:11, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:11, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 20:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Alternative Version

•  Support Indeed better than the above. Yann (talk) 22:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 00:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support There are aspects I like better in the nomination above, but overall this is the better image. Is this ice on the river? If so, we should have a category about that. --Kritzolina (talk) 07:50, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment no ice, long exposure effect on the water. -- Ivar (talk) 09:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Impressive, has a surrealistic touch. @Matthias Süßen: There was a dust spot at the bottom right. Because I know that you are busy in real life, I have taken the liberty to upload a version with the dust spot removed (no other changes), just as a little help. I hope this is OK for you, else just revert please. --Aristeas (talk) 13:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Dear Aristeas. Thank you for your editing. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to do it myself. --Matthias Süßen (talk) 14:07, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

• You are welcome (gerne geschehen), Matthias! --Aristeas (talk) 18:35, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

•  Support --August Geyler (talk) 14:51, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 23:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:39, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 13:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:41, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 479723 02:16, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Shipwrecks

The chosen alternative is: File:Schiffswrack-Uwe-Hamburg-3339-msu-2021-.jpg