Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rosa 'Nostalgie' (d.j.b) 02.jpg

File:Rosa 'Nostalgie' (d.j.b) 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2019 at 05:53:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Rosa 'Nostalgie' (d.j.b) 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rosa 'Nostalgie' (d.j.b) 02.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants Rosa #Family Rosaceae
•  Info Every rose lover is very enthusiastic about this blooming rose. The enchanting scent and the beautiful color combination cream white with cherry red make this rose unique.
  All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Seems about as good as a rose picture can be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Due to the direct flash the picture lacks charm. Wow effect I can't see here.--Ermell (talk) 08:49, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ermell --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:00, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ermell. -- Karelj (talk) 13:57, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

• @Ermell, Uoaei1, and Karelj: * Comment For clarification I have never used a flash with this camera. That is therefore an incorrect assumption!--Famberhorst (talk) 17:18, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

• Excuse me. That is wrongly seen and interpreted by me. But that doesn't change anything about the direct light.--Ermell (talk) 19:28, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

• Again per Ermell --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:33, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

• True. Exif says: "Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression." Please check EXIF before making assumptions. --Cart (talk) 18:18, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

•  Support--MB-one (talk) 15:41, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Conditional support, if the highlights on the flower are dialed down a bit. Daniel Case (talk) 21:35, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

•  Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:04, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - I still think the original brightness was fine, but this is perhaps better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:13, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment Thank you for your comments.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:46, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Seven Pandas (talk) 00:26, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:56, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:08, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 14:43, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 16:44, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Light on leaves and shadow from flower are not good for FP. --Rbrechko (talk) 11:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 12:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants