Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poplar seed tufts 2009 G1.jpg

File:Poplar seed tufts 2009 G1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2010 at 07:03:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Poplar seed tufts 2009 G1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poplar seed tufts 2009 G1.jpg

•  Info Created, uploaded, nominated by User:George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:03, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:03, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:05, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral Not fond of the lighting and angle, but it's not bad.  fetchcomms☛ 00:13, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Not the most exciting subject, but it's educational and a good quality photo. Steven Walling 03:44, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 13:35, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment - just double-checked on this one; it is actually Populus × canadensis (hybrid between Populus nigra and Populus deltoides), not P. nigra as captioned - MPF (talk) 14:54, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

• I have re-checked identification and fully agree with MPF now. It was hybrid with Populus nigra. This very old tree was cut in this spring, but still alive on Commons... --George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:39, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Though, if MPF is correct, we really need to fix the caption. It's pretty exciting if you've never lived near Poplars, like me. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:42, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, it's a well-deserved Valued Image and Quality Image, but not enough for FP IMO. Particularly, the main drawbacks for me are background, lighting and composition. - Keta (talk) 08:05, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Same as Keta.--Christoph Michels (talk) 11:42, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Jebulon (talk) 22:22, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- As above, nothing extraordinary deserving FP status -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose The composition is a bit chaotic. -- Ram-Man 12:08, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:31, 27 May 2010 (UTC)