Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Polish victim of German Luftwaffe action 1939.jpg

File:Polish victim of German Luftwaffe action 1939.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2009 at 02:22:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Polish victim of German Luftwaffe action 1939.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Polish victim of German Luftwaffe action 1939.jpg

•  Info created by Julien Bryan - uploaded by Jarekt - nominated by NormanB (talk) 02:22, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Please read the full description of the picture to understand its horific context and historic relevance. --NormanB (talk) 02:30, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- NormanB (talk) 02:22, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unfortunately this is too small. Can someone access a high-res scan? --99of9 (talk) 02:42, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Silversmith Hewwo 10:14, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Yes, it is quite touching. But it's quite small. Chinmay26r (talk) 11:27, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

{{FPX|Size below 1Mpix --Leafnode✉ 13:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC)}}

• The image was supported by an user other than the nominator. It might be a good idea to read the rules before using the template.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

  My mistake --Leafnode✉ 15:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose Size. —kallerna™ 15:25, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral This is one of the best pictures we have, and one of the best I've ever seen, but I can't support it for the size --Phyrexian (talk) 17:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I agree with NormanB. High horific context and historic relevance. Jacopo Werther (talk) 20:45, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support From FP guidelines "A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph" --Cesco77 (talk) 21:08, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 21:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Resolution (VI) /Daniel78 (talk) 22:52, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too small & low resolution. Takabeg (talk) 04:43, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Yes it is small, but the artistic and historical value is exceptional.--Korall (talk) 13:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /99of9 (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2009 (UTC)