Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama 360 of Basilique Saint-Patrick, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Panorama 360 of Basilique Saint-Patrick, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2019 at 02:26:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Canada
- 360° viewer
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 02:26, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Support Superbly done 360x180° panorama. a few small stitching error, but not easy to notice in my opinion and don't ruin the experience. - Benh (talk) 09:52, 29 September 2019 (UTC)- Support I can't spot any stitching errors. Well done for keeping it clean of tourists. Plenty resolution to see details in the wood and I like this interactive way of exploring an interior. I do wonder if it is a bit bright overall. I see DXR's photo is quite bright too. What is your recollection of the brightness? While I don't like sunlight through windows to be rendered grey (unless it is a grey day) handling the glare from them is probably the weakest part of this image. I know Diliff often liked grey overcast days for cathedrals, since direct sunlight is difficult and any passing clouds can make a stitched panorama fail. I have found in some of my HDR attempts, with 5 steps of exposure, that the brightest one can have too much glare and best just not used. -- Colin (talk) 18:08, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support Nice to see your work here again. Fine panorama and, as ever with this type of image, great fun to view. Cmao20 (talk) 19:08, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
- Cmao20 Thank you, it is also a pleasure to read you, you and the guys are like a kind of platonic family. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:04, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 20:19, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:47, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:01, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Comment - Per Colin, it's a shame there's so much glare coming through the stained glass windows. I also agree with his suggestion that this was not optimal light in which to take this panorama. This is certainly a good document, and maybe my screen is at fault, but I'm not sure it's an FP because I think it could be significantly better on a different day. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:25, 1 October 2019 (UTC)- Support per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 01:41, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Question Is this a carousel or a church? I can not quite recognize it. ;-) -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:58, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Spurzem: Dear Lothar Spurzem, It is a church but the flat distortion of a 360 view makes the structure look like a very elaborate circus carousel. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:01, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- I thought so. But I do not like these unnatural images, though they are very artfully and with much work designed. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:35, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Spurzem: If you haven't done it before, please click here to view correctly the image. This type of image could be difficult to evaluate, especially in WLM, some jurors may not know this. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:49, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Spurzem: Dear Lothar Spurzem, It is a church but the flat distortion of a 360 view makes the structure look like a very elaborate circus carousel. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:01, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment There are at least 4 stitching issues in the arches (top right area, I added a note) Poco2 13:20, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Poc Thanks for add the note. I think that the version uploaded was not my last version. Can I upload the fixed version if the WLM date has passed? (This is an image that was uploaded during the contest month and the image is participating) --Wilfredor (talk) 14:16, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Wilfredor, IIRC this has been asked before and I think it is ok. I think anything that would satisfy COM:OVERWRITE is fine (fixing dust spots, stitching issues, tilt) but major changes (significant exposure change, different projection, major crop) could be a problem. In this case, I suspect the jurors would not see the flaw nor notice the change. -- Colin (talk) 14:23, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Dear Colin, Recently I had a conversation on IRC with others WLM participating users and commons users about the images in 360 degrees. Juries use the Montage tool and the photo is not displayed 360° and It's important that the WLM jury can access to the image description (page in commons) where the link to display it correctly in 360 degrees is located. I have created a task in Montage project github to add this feature to Montage and I would like you to follow it (by clicking on the follow button of the task), that way, someone could attend it, however, I don't think that this improvement is ready for the current WLM event, so it would be a good idea maybe to communicate this to the jury. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:28, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Poc Thanks for add the note. I think that the version uploaded was not my last version. Can I upload the fixed version if the WLM date has passed? (This is an image that was uploaded during the contest month and the image is participating) --Wilfredor (talk) 14:16, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Pofka (talk) 10:00, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- Support Nice! --Boothsift 05:29, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:19, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Canada
