Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palacio Belvedere, Viena, Austria, 2020-02-01, DD 93-95 HDR.jpg

File:Palacio Belvedere, Viena, Austria, 2020-02-01, DD 93-95 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2020 at 14:31:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Palacio Belvedere, Viena, Austria, 2020-02-01, DD 93-95 HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palacio Belvedere, Viena, Austria, 2020-02-01, DD 93-95 HDR.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
•  Info View of the Upper Belvedere Palace during the blue hour, Vienna, Austria. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 14:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:38, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support outstanding! --Ivar (talk) 14:55, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Again, perfect. Beautiful reflections and noise very well controlled. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --StellarHalo (talk) 19:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very classy. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:49, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support though maybe 1/4 stop too bright. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Peulle (talk) 22:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Blue hour -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:38, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Per above. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 05:47, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Wow! --Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:55, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:20, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 14:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:38, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--shizhao (talk) 01:17, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very awesome picture but The light of Sculptures in the top overexposed. light is good except top of the building in center.--Amirpashaei (talk) 07:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

  Amirpashaei: You're really pushing the bar very high...I've reduced the highlights. FYI too, King of Hearts Poco a poco (talk) 10:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

  In this picture we can't see the dimension of Sculptures and their modes, even after reducing the highlights. In my opinion You should have taken it, in bracketing mode. --Amirpashaei (talk) 10:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

  I did, and that's the reason why I add HDR to the file name. You feedback belongs to me in the category hairsplitting. Poco a poco (talk) 13:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

  If you have good light in the brightest section at darkest picture you can recover brightest section in the photoshop. But in the top center of the building we can't see the pattern of Sculptures and texture of the wall because of overexposing.and that's noticeable area not hairsplitting --Amirpashaei (talk) 14:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

  As said, it's, considering that it's a night photo and the distance about 250 m. Poco a poco (talk) 16:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

  While Amirpashaei is correct that the statues just left from center on the top are very slightly burnt (still) the rest are actually well defined - they are just blasted straight on with floodlights so of course there will be very few details visible due to lack of shadows. This is truly a photo loco, totally  Support. -- KennyOMG (talk) 21:59, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose I actually wanted to oppose for the same reasons as Amirpashaei. The flood lighting is far from great (and that's not the photographer's fault of course) with the very annoying shadows of the tree and the details which barely can be distinguished, especially on the top part. And I also agree that this can be mitigated in Ps (I guess it was already). It's not going to change the results of the votes, but just to share. - Benh (talk) 07:54, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Colors, correct temp, crane in the back couldn't be removed (not much of work for Featured picture ) ?! --Mile (talk) 08:54, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment If somebody cares, the crane in the background is gone Poco a poco (talk) 18:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Amirpashaei's concerns are valid, but I think that fussing over an almost undiscernible crane in the background seems a bit overboard. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 19:37, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support very nice. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support simple (so to speak) and effective — Rhododendrites ^talk |  23:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 29 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria