Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ouster OS1-64 lidar point cloud of intersection of Folsom and Dore St, San Francisco.png

File:Ouster OS1-64 lidar point cloud of intersection of Folsom and Dore St, San Francisco.png, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2019 at 06:26:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ouster OS1-64 lidar point cloud of intersection of Folsom and Dore St, San Francisco.png Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ouster OS1-64 lidar point cloud of intersection of Folsom and Dore St, San Francisco.png

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Exteriors
•  Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 06:26, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- dllu (t,c) 06:26, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Might be valuable, but not outstanding. -- -donald- (talk) 07:03, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - Fascinating, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:41, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
• Valuable is a good reason to support this as FP since one of the FP guidelines is: "Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others." dllu (t,c) 06:03, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

• Right, but it's more clearly relevant to COM:VIC, and regardless of the results here, I'd recommend finding a suitable scope for a VIC nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:40, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Interesting, but for me not suitable for FPC. --Domob (talk) 10:57, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral The image is really interesting, but somewhen, the question could be: "What makes this image special in comparison with same-stlye images of other areas?" --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 18:51, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Ah! A screenshot from a 90s cyberpunk video game! :) Really, though, I think there's an issue here of us (or, I'll just speak for myself) not knowing enough about what to look for with an image like this. It's definitely visually interesting, so I'm a little torn. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  21:08, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

• For some context, you can compare it against a google image search for "lidar slam point cloud". You can also read my blog post on this topic for some discussion on the techniques used to create this. dllu (t,c) 21:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Rhododendrites. Daniel Case (talk) 18:34, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

• Not sure how you can oppose per someone who didn't oppose and merely said that he isn't knowledgeable enough to know whether to support. dllu (t,c) 19:49, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Support I find it rather compelling. Kruusamägi (talk) 23:20, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I do, too. After living with this photo for a time, I don't really understand the objections to it. It's a very good composition, really interesting to look at and a different way of experiencing the world. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:46, 14 December 2019 (UTC)