Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ontluikende bloemknop van een Anemone 'Eugenie'. 30-08-2020 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg

File:Ontluikende bloemknop van een Anemone 'Eugenie'. 30-08-2020 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2020 at 17:32:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ontluikende bloemknop van een Anemone 'Eugenie'. 30-08-2020 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ontluikende bloemknop van een Anemone 'Eugenie'. 30-08-2020 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Ranunculaceae
•  Info Budding flower bud of an Anemone 'Eugenie'. Focus stack of 12 photos. Diameter of the flower bud in this photo is ± 11 mm.
  All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Question I think you missed the focus at the nearest point? I'm not convinced that the background is ideal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:20, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I wanted to nominate this, but in view of recent controversies about some of your nominations, I wasn't sure this was a natural bokeh, so you might want to address this. (I certainly think it is.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

• Thank you for your comment. But I don't quite understand your question. What do I need to change?--Famberhorst (talk) 04:40, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Question: is the background artificial? --Ivar (talk) 04:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

• Does that science make the difference to Thee between promoting or not promoting this photo?--Famberhorst (talk) 08:40, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Imho it's only fair for Commons users to know, that the photo has been retouched. And we have a template ("retouched") for this kind of editing. --Ivar (talk) 10:52, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

• I didn't know that moving a plant to a different background had a name! Because honesty is very important to me. I put it directly with the photo. In parentheses. You have not answered my question yet!

• Thank You for adding a template. --Ivar (talk) 12:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support I am in the camp that doesn't see a problem with an artificial background. Cmao20 (talk) 01:58, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose In the opposing campǃ Some photographers do use painted blurred artifical background boards that look natural, but this one doesn't appeal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The main motif is crisp sharp. I'm not a camper, but I don't bother about that background anyway. --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:58, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:04, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support. Meiræ 23:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support Good quality, but I would have preferred a natural background, because natural color combinations are usually more harmonious. Just not sure those two pinks are matching together. Check it out here or there :-) Basile Morin (talk) 06:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Thank you for Thy comments. According to an "expert", this is a good color combination. But that is of course a personal opinion.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:16, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:23, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support the artificial background does not ruin the image for me in this case --StellarHalo (talk) 18:43, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Ahmad^talk 23:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral The artificial background looks nice but looks too artificial and too homogene in comparison to a natural nice bokeh with different colors. Furthermore I'd expect more crispiness of a FS image like this Poco a poco (talk) 14:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Ranunculaceae