Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nottuln, Oldtimermuseum, Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire 346 -- 2021 -- 4484 (bw).jpg

File:Nottuln, Oldtimermuseum, Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire 346 -- 2021 -- 4484 (bw).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2021 at 13:46:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Nottuln, Oldtimermuseum, Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire 346 -- 2021 -- 4484 (bw).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nottuln, Oldtimermuseum, Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire 346 -- 2021 -- 4484 (bw).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Automobiles
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 13:46, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay 💬 13:46, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Regretful oppose Unfortunately, the hood ornament is blurred. Regardless of this, motif and image composition are very good. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:20, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination You're right. Too much for FP ... Thank you. --XRay 💬 08:25, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
• 💬 I would supoprt it if it would be in focus. I did not know about this firm, and their logo is very nice. Something old Sphinga, with two rear tail lights beside. --Mile (talk) 10:52, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
• @PetarM: I've another view and this one is shaper: File:Nottuln, Oldtimermuseum, Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire 346 -- 2021 -- 4483 (bw).jpg. I'm not sure about a nomination. --XRay 💬 13:36, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
• 💬 i like 1st option much more, second hide side details. But i miss more sharpnes. I know what happen when shoting (silver) metal, but i stil think it could be beter than this. I would leave compo as it is. --Mile (talk) 14:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /XRay 💬 08:28, 20 September 2021 (UTC)